Sara Mortaz Hejri; Azim Mirzazadeh; Mohammad Jalili; Hamid Emadi Kochak
Volume 12, Issue 1 , May 2015, , Pages 10-17
Abstract
Background & Objective: Student assessment is one of the most challenging issues of an integrated curriculum While calculating an overall score is in line with the goals of integrated curriculum it poses the risk that some students will deliberately leave out the content of some disciplines ...
Read More
Background & Objective: Student assessment is one of the most challenging issues of an integrated curriculum While calculating an overall score is in line with the goals of integrated curriculum it poses the risk that some students will deliberately leave out the content of some disciplines based on the fact that they have lower credits in each block exam In the present study we describe the experience of Tehran University of Medical Sciences Iran where an integrated medical curriculum has been launched since September 2011 as part of curriculum reform initiative Methods: In the first academic year students passed 4 blocks: Molecule and Cell Tissue Development and Function Cardiovascular Function Blood circulation and BloodRespiratory Function Each block included anatomy histology physiology and embryology The overall block score was reported at the end of each block In addition a cumulative disciplinary score was calculated at the end of the academic year through the summation of the weighted subscores of each discipline in each block Results: At the end of the year the number of students who had failed in histology anatomy embryology and physiology were 15 17 44 and 3 respectively They were required to take a disciplinary examination before the beginning of the next academic year Conclusion: A comparison of the number of students who failed disciplines with low credits (eg histology) with those who failed disciplines with high credits (eg physiology) suggests that the former had systematically been ignored by some students The calculation of a cumulative disciplinary score may reduce the deliberate omission of course content in integrated blocks
Mohammad Jalili; Sara Mortazhejri
Volume 9, Issue 1 , July 2012, , Pages 77-84
Abstract
Background & Objectives: Different methods have been introduced to determine the cutscores of exams However they have been rarely used in our country In this study we used four methods to set a standard for preinternship objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in Tehran University of Medical ...
Read More
Background & Objectives: Different methods have been introduced to determine the cutscores of exams However they have been rarely used in our country In this study we used four methods to set a standard for preinternship objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in Tehran University of Medical Sciences Methods: A prefixed score of 60% was considered in the first approach In the Angoff method a panel including 11faculty members was invited to estimate the probability of passing each station for a borderline student and mean of all estimations was considered as the station standard In borderline regression method a linear regression model for each station was calculated in which the students checklist scores and general scores were considered as dependent and independent variables respectively The station standard was calculated based on grade 2 in Likert scale In Cohens method we set the standard at 60% of the 95th percentile point Results : The standards for the total test in the prefixed score Angoff borderline regression and Cohens methods were respectively 60 4915 4239 and 4274 According to these standards the percentages of passing students were respectively 219% 676% 933% and 924% Conclusion: Using four methods to set standard of an OSCE showed that this approach for determining exams cutscore has significant effect on the calculated standard and the percent of students passing the exam