Strides in Development of Medical Education

Document Type : Original Article


1 Ph.D. in Nursing Education, M.Sc. in Medical Education, Assistant Professor, Department of Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Physiology Research Center, Medical Education Development Center Kerman University of Me

2 M.Sc. in Medical Education, Medical Education Development Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

3 M.Sc. in Epidemiology, Center for Health Research in Modeling, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran


  Background & Objective: The concept of active engagement or academic engagement is a certain understanding of the relationship between students and the university The university is an environment that provides learning opportunities that will lead to student learning The nature and level of learning depends on the students way of using their environmental resources Positive engagement and an interactive supportive academic environment are essential elements in success in the learning process On the other hand isolation alienation and passiveness of students results in their academic failure The aim of the present study was to investigate academic engagement of medical students of Kerman University of Medical Sciences Iran in 20112012 In this study 2 domains of academic engagement were investigated (active and participatory learning and level of academic challenge)   Methods: In this descriptiveanalytical crosssectional study all medical students of Kerman University of Medical Sciences were recruited using stratified random sampling method The data collection tool was the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)   Results: In this study 211 medical students from different academic years with the average age of 226 ± 31 were enrolled The mean active engagement score of the students was 9864 ± 3233 Active and cooperative learning was at a significant level based on all demographic variables except employment The active and cooperative learning of male students differed significantly from that of female students married students from single students different academic years and native from local students Moreover students who were members of one of the academic centers had significantly higher active and participatory learning scores Mean active and participatory learning and level of academic challenge were 174 ± 56 and 217 ± 71 respectively Both domains were reported as unsatisfactory among students   Conclusion: The results showed the unsatisfactory academic engagment status of the students of the Kerman University of Medical Sciences Thus it is hoped that with future planning to use more modern teaching methods which have a higher level of academic challenges and active and collaborative learning and by the appropriate support of the university university staff and faculty members we are able to take steps toward the improvement of academic engagement and thereby student success


  1. Rattle CF, Larose S, Guay F, Senecal C. Perceptions of parental involvement and support as predictors of college students persistence in a science curriculum. J Fam Psychol 2005;19(2): 286-93.
  2. Roshanaei M. Family and Personal Factors that Influence Students Adaptation to College. J Res Plan High Educ. 2010; 16(1): 19-43. [In Persian].
  3. Genn JM. AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 23 (Part 2): Curriculum, environment, climate, quality and change in medical education - a unifying perspective. Med Teach. 2001;23(5):445-54.
  4. Audin K DJ, Barkham M. University Quality of Life and Learning (UNIQoLL): an approach to student well-being, satisfaction and institutional change. J Further Higher Educ. 2003; 27(4): 365-82.
  5. Pimparyon P, Roff S, McAleer S, Poonchai B, Pemba S. Educational environment, student approches to learning and academic achievement in a Thai nursing school. Med Teach. 2000; 22(4):359-65.
  6. Clarke J, Dimartino J. A Personal Prescription for engagement. Principal Leadership. 2004;4(8):19-23.
  7. Chapman E. Alternative approaches to assessing student engagement rates. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation. 2003; 13(8).
  8. Krause KL, Coates H. Students’ Engagement in First-year University. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2008; 35(5):493-505.
  9. Kuh GD. What we're learning about student engagement from NSSE: Benchmarks for effective educational practices. "Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning. 2003; 35(2):24-32.
  10. Miller RL, Rycek RF, Fritson K. The effects of high impact learning experiences on student engagement. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2011; 15:53–9.
  11. Khazaei, M. Rezaei. M Survey .Medical students' personal characteristics and compared to unsuccessfu and l successful students. J Semnan Univ Med Sci. 2007; 9(2): 1-7. [In Persian].
  12. Moniri R, Ghalebtarash H, Mussavi Gh. The Reasons of educational failure among paramedical students in Kashan University of Medical Sciences. Iran J Med Educ. 2006; 1: 135-40. [In Persian].
  13. Talaee A, Hekmatpou D. Explain medical students of Arak University of Medical Sciencs and the factors effect of in active learning: a qualitative  study.  Iran  J  Med  Educ. 2012;  12(2):  131-42.  [In  Persian].
  14. Obeidi  N.  Effective  factors  on  the communication  between  students  and  faculty members  in  the  viewpoint  of  paramedical students.  Educ  Strategies  Med  Sci.  2010;  3(3): 133-6.  [In  Persian].
  15. Ghadami A,  Salehi  B,  Sajadi  Sh,  Naji  H. Students'  Points  of  View  Regarding  Effective Factors in Establishing Communication between  Students  and  Faculty  Members.  Iran  J Med  Educ.  2007;  7(1):  149-54.  [In  Persian].
  16. Aliasgharpour  M,  Monjamed  Z,  Bahrani  N. Factors  Affecting  Students'  Evaluation  of Teachers  Comparing  Viewpoints  of  Teachers and  Students.  Iran  J  Med  Educ.  2010; 10(2):186-95.  [In  Persian].
  17. Wang  MT,  Holocombe  R.  Adolescents' perceptions  of  classroom  environment,  school engagement,  and  academic  achievement.  Am Educa  Res  J.  2010;47(3):633–62.
  18. Finn JD,  Rock  DA.  Academic  success  among students  at  risk  for  school  failure.  J  App Psychol.  1997;  82(2):  221.
  19. Ratelle  CF1,  Larose  S,  Guay  F,  Senécal  C. Perceptions  of  parental  involvement  and support  as  predictors  of  college  students persistence  in  a  science  curriculum.  J  Fam Psychol.  2005;19(2):286-93.
  20. Noohi  E,  Abaszadeh  A,  Maddah  B.  University engagement  in  nursing  students:  With emphasize  on  collaborative  learning.  Iran  J Nurs  Midwifery  Res.  2013;  18(6):505-10.
  21. National  Youth  Organization  affiliated  to Presidency  of  The  Islamic  Republic  of  Iran. The  final  report  of  national  research  proposal on  consultation  with  youth:  The  attitude  and status  youth  in  Iran.  2001;382:  72.  [In  Persian]
  22. Seif AA.  Educational  Psychology.  14nd  ed. Tehran:  Agah  publication;  1994:  217.  [In Persian]
  23. Goudarzi  A,  Gaminian  V.  Principles,  basic  and theories  of  organizational  climate.  Isfahan: Publications  of  University  Jihad  (Jahad-eDaneshgahi);  2002:  46-59.  [In  Persian]
  24. Zamani  A,  Shams  B,  Farajzadegan  Z.  The Viewpoints  of  Clinical  Faculty  Members about;Teaching  Communication  Skills  to Medical  Students.  Iran  J  Med  Educ. 2003;3(1):44-51.  [In  Persian]
  25. Shakurnia A,  Motlagh  ME,  Malayeri  AM. Students’  Opinion  on  Factors  Affecting Faculty  Evaluation  in  Jundishapur  University of  Medical  Sciences.  Iran  J  Med  Educ. 2005;5(2):109-17.  [In  Persian]
  26. Umbach  PD,  Wawrzynski  MR.  Faculty  do matter:  The  role  of  college  faculty  in  student learning  and  engagement.  Res  Higher  Educ. 2005;46(  2):153-84.
  27. Carini  RM,  Kuh  GD,  Klein  SP.  Student engagement  and  student  learning:  Testing  the Linkages.  Res  Higher  Educ.  2006;  47(1):1-32.
  28. Junco  R,  Heiberger  G,  Loken  E.  The  effect  of Twitter  on  college  student  engagement  and grades.  Journal  of  Computer  Assisted Learning.  2010;27(2):  119-32.
  29. Pike  GR,  Kuh  GD,  McCormick  AC,  Ethington CA,  Smart  JC.  If  and  when  money  matters: The relationships expenditures,student among educational engagement and students’learning  outcomes.  Res  High  Educ. 2011;  52(1):81–106.
  30. Miller RL,  Rycek  RF,  Fritson  K.  The  effects  of high  impact  learning  experiences  on  student engagement.  Procedia-Social  and  Behavioral Sciences.  2011;  15:53–9.