Document Type : Original Article
Ph.D. in Nursing Education, M.Sc. in Medical Education, Assistant Professor, Department of Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Physiology Research Center, Medical Education Development Center Kerman University of Me
M.Sc. in Medical Education, Medical Education Development Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
M.Sc. in Epidemiology, Center for Health Research in Modeling, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
Background & Objective: The concept of active engagement or academic engagement is a certain understanding of the relationship between students and the university The university is an environment that provides learning opportunities that will lead to student learning The nature and level of learning depends on the students way of using their environmental resources Positive engagement and an interactive supportive academic environment are essential elements in success in the learning process On the other hand isolation alienation and passiveness of students results in their academic failure The aim of the present study was to investigate academic engagement of medical students of Kerman University of Medical Sciences Iran in 20112012 In this study 2 domains of academic engagement were investigated (active and participatory learning and level of academic challenge) Methods: In this descriptiveanalytical crosssectional study all medical students of Kerman University of Medical Sciences were recruited using stratified random sampling method The data collection tool was the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Results: In this study 211 medical students from different academic years with the average age of 226 ± 31 were enrolled The mean active engagement score of the students was 9864 ± 3233 Active and cooperative learning was at a significant level based on all demographic variables except employment The active and cooperative learning of male students differed significantly from that of female students married students from single students different academic years and native from local students Moreover students who were members of one of the academic centers had significantly higher active and participatory learning scores Mean active and participatory learning and level of academic challenge were 174 ± 56 and 217 ± 71 respectively Both domains were reported as unsatisfactory among students Conclusion: The results showed the unsatisfactory academic engagment status of the students of the Kerman University of Medical Sciences Thus it is hoped that with future planning to use more modern teaching methods which have a higher level of academic challenges and active and collaborative learning and by the appropriate support of the university university staff and faculty members we are able to take steps toward the improvement of academic engagement and thereby student success
- Rattle CF, Larose S, Guay F, Senecal C. Perceptions of parental involvement and support as predictors of college students persistence in a science curriculum. J Fam Psychol 2005;19(2): 286-93.
- Roshanaei M. Family and Personal Factors that Influence Students Adaptation to College. J Res Plan High Educ. 2010; 16(1): 19-43. [In Persian].
- Genn JM. AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 23 (Part 2): Curriculum, environment, climate, quality and change in medical education - a unifying perspective. Med Teach. 2001;23(5):445-54.
- Audin K DJ, Barkham M. University Quality of Life and Learning (UNIQoLL): an approach to student well-being, satisfaction and institutional change. J Further Higher Educ. 2003; 27(4): 365-82.
- Pimparyon P, Roff S, McAleer S, Poonchai B, Pemba S. Educational environment, student approches to learning and academic achievement in a Thai nursing school. Med Teach. 2000; 22(4):359-65.
- Clarke J, Dimartino J. A Personal Prescription for engagement. Principal Leadership. 2004;4(8):19-23.
- Chapman E. Alternative approaches to assessing student engagement rates. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation. 2003; 13(8).
- Krause KL, Coates H. Students’ Engagement in First-year University. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2008; 35(5):493-505.
- Kuh GD. What we're learning about student engagement from NSSE: Benchmarks for effective educational practices. "Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning. 2003; 35(2):24-32.
- Miller RL, Rycek RF, Fritson K. The effects of high impact learning experiences on student engagement. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2011; 15:53–9.
- Khazaei, M. Rezaei. M Survey .Medical students' personal characteristics and compared to unsuccessfu and l successful students. J Semnan Univ Med Sci. 2007; 9(2): 1-7. [In Persian].
- Moniri R, Ghalebtarash H, Mussavi Gh. The Reasons of educational failure among paramedical students in Kashan University of Medical Sciences. Iran J Med Educ. 2006; 1: 135-40. [In Persian].
- Talaee A, Hekmatpou D. Explain medical students of Arak University of Medical Sciencs and the factors effect of in active learning: a qualitative study. Iran J Med Educ. 2012; 12(2): 131-42. [In Persian].
- Obeidi N. Effective factors on the communication between students and faculty members in the viewpoint of paramedical students. Educ Strategies Med Sci. 2010; 3(3): 133-6. [In Persian].
- Ghadami A, Salehi B, Sajadi Sh, Naji H. Students' Points of View Regarding Effective Factors in Establishing Communication between Students and Faculty Members. Iran J Med Educ. 2007; 7(1): 149-54. [In Persian].
- Aliasgharpour M, Monjamed Z, Bahrani N. Factors Affecting Students' Evaluation of Teachers Comparing Viewpoints of Teachers and Students. Iran J Med Educ. 2010; 10(2):186-95. [In Persian].
- Wang MT, Holocombe R. Adolescents' perceptions of classroom environment, school engagement, and academic achievement. Am Educa Res J. 2010;47(3):633–62.
- Finn JD, Rock DA. Academic success among students at risk for school failure. J App Psychol. 1997; 82(2): 221.
- Ratelle CF1, Larose S, Guay F, Senécal C. Perceptions of parental involvement and support as predictors of college students persistence in a science curriculum. J Fam Psychol. 2005;19(2):286-93.
- Noohi E, Abaszadeh A, Maddah B. University engagement in nursing students: With emphasize on collaborative learning. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2013; 18(6):505-10.
- National Youth Organization affiliated to Presidency of The Islamic Republic of Iran. The final report of national research proposal on consultation with youth: The attitude and status youth in Iran. 2001;382: 72. [In Persian]
- Seif AA. Educational Psychology. 14nd ed. Tehran: Agah publication; 1994: 217. [In Persian]
- Goudarzi A, Gaminian V. Principles, basic and theories of organizational climate. Isfahan: Publications of University Jihad (Jahad-eDaneshgahi); 2002: 46-59. [In Persian]
- Zamani A, Shams B, Farajzadegan Z. The Viewpoints of Clinical Faculty Members about;Teaching Communication Skills to Medical Students. Iran J Med Educ. 2003;3(1):44-51. [In Persian]
- Shakurnia A, Motlagh ME, Malayeri AM. Students’ Opinion on Factors Affecting Faculty Evaluation in Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences. Iran J Med Educ. 2005;5(2):109-17. [In Persian]
- Umbach PD, Wawrzynski MR. Faculty do matter: The role of college faculty in student learning and engagement. Res Higher Educ. 2005;46( 2):153-84.
- Carini RM, Kuh GD, Klein SP. Student engagement and student learning: Testing the Linkages. Res Higher Educ. 2006; 47(1):1-32.
- Junco R, Heiberger G, Loken E. The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 2010;27(2): 119-32.
- Pike GR, Kuh GD, McCormick AC, Ethington CA, Smart JC. If and when money matters: The relationships expenditures,student among educational engagement and students’learning outcomes. Res High Educ. 2011; 52(1):81–106.
- Miller RL, Rycek RF, Fritson K. The effects of high impact learning experiences on student engagement. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2011; 15:53–9.