Strides in Development of Medical Education

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. in Medical Education, Assistant Professor, Medical Education and Development Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2 Specialist in Internal Medicine, Associate Professor, Department of Medical Education, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

3 Ph.D. in Clinical Psychology, Assistant Professor, Department of Medical Education, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

4 Specialist in Emergency Medicine, Professor, Department of Medical Education, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

5 Ph.D. in Epidemiology, Assistant Professor, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

6 Ph.D. in Anatomy, Professor, Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

7 M.D., Professor, Department of Medical Education, School of Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England

Abstract

Background & Objective: Selfregulated learning (SRL) is highly task and context dependent Microanalytic assessment method measures students SRL processes while performing a particular learning task The present study aimed to design a microanalytic SRL assessment protocol for biomedical science learning Methods: This mixed method study was conducted in Tehran University of Medical Sciences Iran in 2013 The data collection tool was a microanalytic SRL assessment protocol that was designed based on the literature review expert opinion and cognitive interview with medical students and then piloted The participants consisted of 13 second year medical students The subjects were interviewed while conducting a biomedical science learning task Interviews were recorded transcribed and coded based on a predetermined coding framework Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data Results: The microanalytic SRL assessment protocol was developed in three parts; interview guide coding framework and biomedical science learning task An interview guide was designed consisting of 6 openended questions aimed at assessing 5 SRL subprocesses of goal setting strategic planning metacognitive monitoring causal attribution and adaptive inferences and a closeended question regarding selfefficacy Based on the pilot study most participants reported taskspecific and taskgeneral processes for the subprocesses of strategic planning (92%) metacognitive monitoring (77%) causal attribution (85%) and adaptive inferences (92%) Conclusion: The developed protocol could capture the finegrained nature of the selfregulatory subprocesses of medical students for biomedical science learning Therefore it has the potential application of modifying SRL processes in early years of medical school 

Keywords

  1. Dornan T, Mann KV, Scherpbier AJJA, Spencer JA. Medical education: theory and practice. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2011.
  2. Artino AR, Hemmer PA, Durning SJ. Using self-regulated learning theory to understand the beliefs, emotions, and behaviors of struggling medical students. Acad Med. 2011 Oct;86(10 Suppl):S35-8.
  3. Stegers-Jager KM, Cohen-Schotanus J, Themmen AP. Motivation, learning strategies, participation and medical school performance. Med Educ. 2012;46(7):678-88.
  4. Karimi M, Farahbakhsh K. Relationship between affective self-regulation and study skills with educational performance of students of Isfahan University of Medical Science. Iran J Med Educ. 2012; 11(9):1149-61. [In Persian]
  5. Abbasi M, Dargahi S, Pirani Z, Bonyadi F. Role of Procrastination and Motivational Self-Regulation in Predicting Students’ Academic Engagement. Iran J Med Educ. 2015; 15(23): 160-9. [In Persian]
  6. Reaume D, Ropp T. Learning in medical school: Transition issues, strategy use, and self-regulation. Canadian J Higher Educ. 2005; 35(4):27-53.
  7. Eva KW, Regehr G. Self-assessment in the health professions: a reformulation and research agenda. Acad Med. 2005;80(10 Suppl):S46-54.
  8. Davis DA, Mazmanian PE, Fordis M, Van Harrison R, Thorpe KE, Perrier L. Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review. JAMA. 2006;296(9):1094-102.
  9. Dignath C, Büttner G. Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students. A meta-analysis on intervention studies at primary and secondary school level. Metacognition and Learning. 2008; 3(3):231-64.
  10. Cleland J, Leggett H, Sandars J, Costa MJ, Patel R, Moffat M. The remediation challenge: theoretical and methodological insights from a systematic review. Med Educ. 2013;47(3):242-51.
  11. Hattie J, Biggs J, Purdie N. Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: A meta-analysis. Rev Educ Res. 1996; 66(2):99-136.
  12. Winston KA, Van der Vleuten CP, Scherpbier AJ. An investigation into the design and effectiveness of a mandatory cognitive skills programme for at-risk medical students. Med Teach. 2010;32(3):236-43.
  13. Stegers-Jager KM, Cohen-Schotanus J, Themmen AP. The effect of a short integrated study skills programme for first-year medical students at risk of failure: a randomised controlled trial. Med Teach. 2013;35(2):120-6.
  14. Cleary TJ, Callan GL, Zimmerman BJ. Assessing self-regulation as a cyclical, context-specific phenomenon: overview and analysis of SRL microanalytic protocols. Educ Res Int. 2012; 2012:1-19.
  15. Zimmerman BJ. Attaining self-regulation: A social-cognitive perspective. In: Boekaerts M, Pintrich PR, Zeidner M, editors. Handbook of self-regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 2000: 13-39.
  16. Durning SJ, Cleary TJ, Sandars J, Hemmer P, Kokotailo P, Artino AR. Perspective: viewing "strugglers" through a different lens: how a self-regulated learning perspective can help medical educators with assessment and remediation. Acad Med. 2011; 86(4):488-95.
  17. Zimmerman BJ. Investigating self-regulation and motivation: historical background, methodological developments and future prospects. Am Educ Res J. 2008; 45(1):166-83.
  18. Cleary TJ, Sandars J. Assessing self-regulatory processes during clinical skill performance: a pilot study. Med Teach. 2011; 33(7):e368-74.
  19. 19. Artino  AR,  Cleary  TJ,  Dong  T,  Hemmer  PA, Durning    Exploring  clinical  reasoning  in novices:  a  self-regulated  learning  microanalytic assessment  approach.  Med  Educ.  2014;48(3): 280-91.
  20. Cleary TJ,  Dong  T,  Artino  AR.  Examining  shifts in  medical  students'  microanalytic  motivation beliefs  and  regulatory  processes  during  a diagnostic  reasoning  task.  Adv  Health  Sci  Educ Theory  Pract.  2015;20(3):611-26.
  21. Artino  AR,  La  Rochelle  JS,  Dezee  KJ,  Gehlbach H.  Developing  questionnaires  for  educational research:  AMEE  Guide  No.  87.  Med  Teach. 2014;36(6):463-74.
  22. Cleary  TJ,  Zimmerman  BJ.  Self-regulation differences  during  athletic  practice  by  experts, non-experts,  and  novices.  J  Applied  Sport Psychology.  2001;  13(2):185-206.
  23. Zimmerman  BJ,  Schunk  DH.  Self-regulating intellectual  processes  and  outcomes:  A  social cognitive  perspective.  In:  Dai  DY,  Sternberg  RJ, editors.  Motivation,  emotion,  and  cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning  and  development.  Mahwah,  NJ: Lawrence  Erlbaum;  2004:  323-49.
  24. Woods  NN,  Neville  AJ,  Levinson  AJ,  Howey  EH, Oczkowski  WJ,  Norman  GR.  The  value  of  basic science  in  clinical  diagnosis.  Acad  Med.  2006; 81(10  Suppl):S124-7.
  25. Woods  NN.  Science  is  fundamental:  the  role  of biomedical  knowledge  in  clinical  reasoning.  Med Educ.  2007;  41(12):1173-7.
  26. Gandomkar R,  Mirzazadeh  A,  Jalili  M,  Yazdani K,  Fata  L,  Sandars  J.  Self-regulated  learning processes  of  medical  students  during  an  academic learning  task.  Med  Educ.  2016;  50(10):1065-74.
  27. DiBenedetto  MK,  Zimmerman  BJ.  Differences  in Self-Regulatory  Processes  among  Students Studying  Science:  A  Microanalytic  Investigation. International  J  Educational  and  Psychological Assessment.  2010;  5(1):2-24. 
  28. Leggett  H,  Sandars  J,  Burns  P.  Helping  students to  improve  their  academic  performance:  a  pilot study  of  a  workbook  with  self-monitoring exercises.  Med  Teach.  2012;34(9):751-3.
  29. Callan  GL.  (dissertation).  Self-regulated  learning (SRL)  microanalysis  for  mathematical  problem solving:  A  comparison  of  a  SRL  event  measure, questionnaires,  and  a  teacher  rating  scale. Wisconsin:  The  University  of  WisconsinMilwaukee;  2014:  196.

30.  Cleary  TJ,  Callan  GL,  Malatesta  J,  Adams  T. Examining  the  level  of  convergence  among  selfregulated  learning  microanalytic  processes, achievement,  and  a  self-report  questionnaire.  J Psychoeducational  Assessment.  2015;  33(5): 439-50.