Strides in Development of Medical Education

Document Type : Original Article


1 Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Biostatistics, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran

3 Department of Medical Education, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran


Background Traditional teaching methods such as lectures alone cannot meet educational needs in the medical sciences. It is necessary to supplement lectures with additional methods in order to prepare the students for problem solving in real situations. Objectives The present study aimed at employing the problem-based learning (PBL) method in the theoretical physiology of autonomic nervous system (ANS) course for medical students and comparing the results with the customary method of lectures. Methods In 2014, first-year medical students enrolled in the neurology curricular block at Tehran University of Medical Sciences were randomly assigned to two groups. One group participated in classes with lectures, while the other group was divided into subgroups of 10 for PBL sessions. In the first session of PBL, a scenario pertaining to ANS was presented, and then the students were asked to expand the scenario and discuss it using brainstorming method. The first session was held on introducing a reference for studying. In the second session, students in each group presented the results of their individual studies, and a representative from each group gave a report in line with the educational objectives of the class. Finally, a short-answer final test and survey were administered. Data were analyzed using independent samples t-test and Levene’s test. Results Based on results, mean scores of students in the PBL group (15.20 ± 3.31) were significantly higher than those of students in the lecture group (12.38 ± 4.49) (P < 0.001). Based on the survey, students preferred PBL to lectures. Conclusions PBL promotes motivation, self-confidence, and communication skills, all of which contribute to the better learning of the students who attended the theoretical physiology of ANS course.


  1. Arah OA, Heineman MJ, Lombarts KM. Factors influencing residents’ evaluations of clinical faculty member teaching qualities and role model status. Med Educ. 2012;46(4):381–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-

2923.2011.04176.x. [PubMed: 22429174].

  1. Abraham RR, Vinod P, Kamath MG, Asha K, Ramnarayan K. Learning approaches of undergraduate medical students to physiology in a non-PBL- and partially PBL-oriented curriculum. Adv Physiol Educ.

2008;32(1):35–7. doi: 10.1152/advan.00063.2007. [PubMed: 18334566].

  1. Chou FH, Chin CC. Experience of problem-based learning in nursing education at Kaohsiung Medical University. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2009;25(5):258–63. doi: 10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70071-3. [PubMed:19502147].
  1. Taylor D, Miflin B. Problem-based learning: where are we now? Med Teach. 2008;30(8):742–63. doi: 10.1080/01421590802217199. [PubMed:18946818].
  2. Davis MH. AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 15: Problem-based learning: a practical guide. Med Teach. 1999;21(2):130–40. doi:10.1080/01421599979743. [PubMed: 21275726].
  3. Azizi F. Medical education: mission, vision and challenges [In persian]. 1st ed. Tehran: Ministry of Health and Medical Education; 2003. 398 p.
  4. Johnson JP, Mighten A. A comparison of teaching strategies: lecture notes combined with structured group discussion versus lecture only. J Nurs Educ. 2005;44(7):319–22. [PubMed: 16094791].
  5. Dochy F, Segers M, Van den Bossche P, Gijbels D. Effects of problembased learning: a meta-analysis. Learn Instruct. 2003;13(5):533–68. doi:10.1016/s0959-4752(02)00025-7.
  6. Rimal J, Paudel BH, Shrestha A. Introduction of problem-based learning in undergraduate dentistry program in Nepal. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2015;5(Suppl 1):S45–9. doi: 10.4103/2229-516X.162276. [PubMed:26380211].
  7. Krasne S, Stevens CD, Wilkerson L. Improving medical literature sourcing by first-year medical students in problem-based learning:outcomes of early interventions. Acad Med. 2014;89(7):1069–74. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000288. [PubMed: 24826850].
  8. Doucet MD, Purdy RA, Kaufman DM, Langille DB. Comparison of problem-based learning and lecture format in continuing medical education on headache diagnosis and management. Med Educ.1998; 32(6): 590–6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.1998.00277.x. [PubMed:10211248].
  9. van Berkel H, Schmidt H. On the additional value of lectures in a problem-based curriculum. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2005;18(1):45–61.doi: 10.1080/13576280500042648. [PubMed: 15804645].
  10. Pourshanazari AA, Roohbakhsh A, Khazaei M, Tajadini H. Comparing the long-term retention of a physiology course for medical students with the traditional and problem-based learning. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2013;18(1):91–7. doi: 10.1007/s10459-012-9357-0. [PubMed:22361894].
  11. Baghaie M, Atrkar RZ. A comparison of two Teaching Strategies: Lecture and PBL, on learning and retaining in nursing students. J Gilan Univ Med Sci. 2003;12(47):86–94.
  12. Alessio H. Student perceptions about and performance in problembased learning. J Scholarship Teach Learn. 2012;4(1):23–34.
  13. Gijbels D, Dochy F, Van den Bossche P, Segers M. Effects of problembased learning: A meta-analysis from the angle of assessment. Rev Educ Res. 2016;75(1):27–61. doi: 10.3102/00346543075001027.
  14. Ju H, Choi I, Yoon BY. Do medical students generate sound arguments during small group discussions in problem-based learning?: an analysis of preclinical medical students’ argumentation according to a framework of hypothetico-deductive reasoning. Korean J Med Educ. 2017;29(2):101–9. doi:10.3946/kjme.2017.57. [PubMed: 28597873].