Sara Shafian; Payam Khazaeli; Maryam Okhovati
Reza Malek Pourafshar; Reza Shojaeipour; Payam Khazaeli; Azam Bazrafshan; Amin Beigzadeh; Mahmood Reza Dehghani
Abstract
Background: Currently, many medical universities in Iran use e-learning programs to educate and evaluate students. This teaching and assessment method is highly significant during the coronavirus epidemic.Objectives: The present study was conducted to compare the analytic indices of in-person vs. online ...
Read More
Background: Currently, many medical universities in Iran use e-learning programs to educate and evaluate students. This teaching and assessment method is highly significant during the coronavirus epidemic.Objectives: The present study was conducted to compare the analytic indices of in-person vs. online exams at the Kerman University of Medical Sciences, (KUMS), Iran.Method: This descriptive-analytical cross-sectional study was conducted in 2020. The study samples included all exams given at the KMUS and midterm exam scores obtained from in-person and online courses in the first and second semesters in the academic year 2019-2020. The exams were selected based on courses, and the same courses were offered both in-person and online; thus, only one group was studied. Course exam indicators, including difficulty and discriminative index, were examined. Data analyzed using SPSS software version 22.Results: The mean of the difficulty index related to in-person and online exams were (0.62 ± 0.1) and (0.68 ± 0.1), respectively. (P=0.01). The mean of the discriminative index related to in-person (0.30± 0.07) and online (0.33± 0.08) exams had no statistically significant difference (P˃0.05). The frequency of easy questions in online exams was significantly higher, (55% vs. 43%) (p = 0.008). The frequency of questions with an appropriate discriminative index was significantly higher for in-person exams compared to online exams (58% vs. 54%) (p = 0.01).Conclusion: The difficulty index was acceptable and appropriate for both in-person and online exams. Both exams had appropriate quality according to the discriminative index .Therefore, it seems that e-learning programs and assessments can be a good alternative to in-person teaching in emergencies.
Mahmood-Reza Dehghani; Fereidoon Azizi; Aliakbar Haghdoost; Nouzar Nakhaee; Payam Khazaeli; Zinat Ravangard
Volume 10, Issue 4 , February 2014, , Pages 403-412
Abstract
Background & Objective: Social accountability medical education in all fields considers health problems priorities in specified countries Health provision (social accountability) encounters many challenges in its delivery due to more reasons and faculty innovations seem essential in promotion of ...
Read More
Background & Objective: Social accountability medical education in all fields considers health problems priorities in specified countries Health provision (social accountability) encounters many challenges in its delivery due to more reasons and faculty innovations seem essential in promotion of education This study was designed in order to investigate social accountability medical education and innovations of clinical faculty members Methods: In a crosssectional and triangulation study point of view of 72 clinical faculty members in Kerman University of Medical Sciences Iran about social accountability medical education and their innovations was investigated by two separated questionnaires Results: Situation analysis of social accountability medical education in Kerman University of Medical Sciences showed that this form of education is in weaknessthreatened status The score of strengths was significantly difference among men and women and score of weakness was significantly difference among different educational groups and academic degrees (P < 005) There was no significant difference between situation analysis of social accountability medical education innovation and other demographic and educational variables Conclusion: Status of social accountability medical education (weaknessthreatened) is not appropriate in Kerman University of Medical Sciences in order to its promotion there must be an appropriate mechanism In addition potentials of faculty members must be considered about innovation for social accountability medical education
Ashraf Adhami; Ali Akbar Haghdoost; Payam Khazaeli; Marhamat Afzali
Volume 9, Issue 1 , July 2012, , Pages 58-64
Abstract
Background & Objectives: In order to improve the quality of teaching attention to the students academic progress is important In the present study the internal consistency of students scores has been used as an index for the evaluation of the validity of course exams Methods: All scores of Pharmacy ...
Read More
Background & Objectives: In order to improve the quality of teaching attention to the students academic progress is important In the present study the internal consistency of students scores has been used as an index for the evaluation of the validity of course exams Methods: All scores of Pharmacy students graduated in 2007 and 2008 were collected from the of Kerman University of Medical Sciences We computed the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) between course scores and grade point average (GPA) In addition coefficients between the mean score in subgroups of courses with GPA were computed Results : In most courses the correlation coefficient between the course score and GPA was in the range of 04 to 06 The lowest correlation coefficients belonged to sport course (004) and thesis (033) while the highest were for theoretical biochemistry (078) and practical chemistry (076) The correlation coefficient of male students scores was 049 and that of female students was 040 that shows significant difference (p < 001) In whole the scores of basic courses showed higher correlation compared to general and special courses The correlations in theoretical and practical courses were equal Conclusion: It seems that this convenient method for investigating the internal consistency of course scores can be used as an index for validity of corse scores Significant difference in correlation coefficients among different courses requires special attention to some courses for investigating the probable testing errors even though in most courses the coefficients were in the acceptable range
