Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1 Ph.D. in Nursing, Maternal and Child Care Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
2 Ph.D. in Management Education, Associate Professor, Department of Educational Management, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3 Ph.D. in Nursing, Associate Professor, Department of Nursing, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Background & Objective: Reviewing the kinds of performance evaluation systems for academic members applying by different universities is one of the most important approaches to develop one Therefore as part of a broader research aimed to provide a performance evaluation model we attempted to compare the performance evaluation systems of some universities around the world Methods: This study was performed through a qualitative content analysis method with the theoretical approach based on the Performance Appraisal Diagnostic Model (Wolf 2003) The study population included all universities of the five continents The universities that had their performance evaluation systems in English in their websites were chosen as sample group A search was also conducted with the determined keywords through the search engines The faculty performance evaluation systems of 19 universities were chosen from the continents: America (10) Europe (3) Oceania (2) Africa (3) and Asia (one in Turkey ) Results: The philosophies of all the reviewed performance evaluation systems were performance recognition continuous development identifying performance barriers and individual development needs These systems were related to the systems of payment compensation recruiting and performance development The effectiveness of a faculty member was characterized by his/her performance indicators in line with the mission of organization in education scholarship and clerical area There was a combination of the trait behavior and resultbased systems with different weights according to organizational and professional positions The quantitative and qualitative data were gathered by different measures from multiple sources Conclusion: Considering the findings the reviewed performance evaluation systems for academic members have important issues according to the Wolfs diagnostic model
Keywords
- Genn JM. AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 23 (Part 1): Curriculum, environment, climate, quality and change in medical education—a unifying perspective. Med Teach 2001; 23(4): 337-44.
- Schönrock-Adema J, Bouwkamp-Timmer T, van Hell EA, Cohen-Schotanus J. Key elements in assessing the educational environment: where is the theory? Adv Health Sci Educ 2012; 17(5):727-42.
- Jamaiah I. Review of research in learning environment. J Univ Malaya Med Cent 2008; 11(1):7-11.
- Boor K. The Clinical Learning Climate. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam; 2009.
- Soemantri D, Herrera C, Riquelme A. Measuring the educational environment in health professions studies: A systematic review. Med Teach 2010; 32(12): 974-52.
- Hutchinson L. ABC of learning and teaching: Educational environment. Br Med J 2003; 326(7393): 810-2.
- Harden RM. The learning environment and the curriculum. Med Teach 2001; 23(4): 3356.
- Myint SK. Using the WlHlC Questionnaire to Measure the Learning Environment. Teaching and Learning 2001; 22(2): 54-61.
- Soltani Arabshahi K, Kouhpayezadeh J, Sobuti B. The Educational Environment of Main Clinical Wards in Educational Hospitals Affiliated to Iran University of Medical Sciences: Learners' Viewpoints Based on DREEM Model. Iran J Med Educ 2008; 8(1): 43-50. [In Persian]
- The Effect of the Physical Learning Environment on Teaching and Learning. Victorian institute of teaching. Available from: http://www.vit.vic.edu.au/SiteCollectionDoc uments/PDF/1137_The-Effect-of-thePhysical-Learning-Environment-onTeaching-and-Learning.pdf
- Haghani F, Mollabashi R, Jamshidian S. Physical Environment Status of Educational Clinics in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences: An Inseparable Part of TeachingLearning Process in Clinic. Iran J Med Educ 2009; 8(2): 239-45. [In Persian]
- Riquelme A, Herrera C, Aranis C. Psychometric analyses and internal consistency of the PHEEM questionnaire to measure the clinical learning environment in the clerkship of a Medical School in Chile. Med Teach 2009; 31(6): 221-5.
- Zawawi AH, Elzubeir M .Using DREEM to compare graduating students' perceptions of learning environments at medical schools adopting contrasting educational strategies. Med Teach 2012; 34(1): s25-s31.
- Jiffry MTM, McAleer S, Fernando S, et al. Using the DREEM questionnaire to gather baseline information on an evolving medical school in Sri Lanka. Med Teach 2005; 27(4):348-52.
- Miles S, Swift L, Leinster SJ. The Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM): A review of its adoption and use. Med Teach 2012; 34(9):e620-e34.
- Roff S, Mcaleer S, Harden RM. Development and validation of the Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM). Med Teach 1997; 19(4):295-9.
- Roff S. The Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure (DREEM)--a generic instrument for measuring students' perceptions of undergraduate health professions curricula. Med Teach 2005; 27(4): 322-5.
- Demirören M, Palaoglu O, Kemahli S, Ozyurda F, Ayhan IH. Perceptions of students in different phases of medical education of educational environment: Ankara University Faculty of Medicine. Med Educ Online 2008; 13:8.
- Dimoliatis ID, Vasilaki E, Anastassopoulos P, Ioannidis JP, Roff S. Validation of the Greek Translation of the Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM). Educ Health 2010; 23(1): 348.
- Badsar A, Taramsari MR, Hoseinpour J, Khaje Jahromi S. Postgraduate Trainees’ Perception of the Clinical Learning Environment at an Iranian Medical Sciences University. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 2012; 46:1084-90.
- Vieira JE. The postgraduate hospital educational environment measure (PHEEM) questionnaire identifies quality of instruction as a key factor predicting academic achievement. Clinics 2008; 63(6):741-6.
- Riquelme A, Padilla O, Herrera C. Development of ACLEEM questionnaire, an instrument measuring residents' educational environment in postgraduate ambulatory setting. Med Teach 2012; (1), e861-e6.
- Roth LM, Severson RK, Probst JC, Monsur JC, Markova T, Kushner SA, et al. Exploring physician and staff perceptions of the learning environment in ambulatory residency clinics. Fam Med 2006; 38(3): 177-84.
- McAleer S, Roff S. A practical guide to using the Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM). AMEE Medical Education Guide 2001;23: 29-33.
- Yusoff MSB. The Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis in a Sample of Malaysian Medical Students. Intern J Human Soc Sci 2012; 2 (16):313-21.
- McAleer SRS. What is Educational Climate? Med Teach 2001; 23(4): 333-4.
- Hammond SM, O'Rourke M, Kelly M, Bennett D, O'Flynn S. A psychometric appraisal of the DREEM. BMC Med Educ 2012; 12(1):2.
- .Pololi L, Price J. Validation and use of an instrument to measure the learning environment as perceived by medical students. Teach Learn Med 2000; 12(4): 201–7.
- Nagraj S, Wall D, Jones E. Can STEEM be used to measure the educational environment within the operating theatre for undergraduate medical students? Med Teach 2006; 28(7):642–7.
- Mulrooney A. Development of an instrument to measure the practice vocational training environment in Ireland. Med Teach 2005; 27(4):338–42.
- Pace C, Stern G. An approach to the measurement of psychological characteristics of college environments. J Educ Psychol 1958; 49(5): 269–77.
- Rotem A, Godwin P, Du J. learning in hospital settings. Teach Learn Med 1995; 7(4):211–7.
- Holt MC, Roff S. Development and validation of the Anesthetic Theatre Educational Environment Measure (ATEEM). Med Teach 2004; 26(6): 553–8.
- Cassar K. Development of an instrument to measure the surgical operating theatre learning environment as perceived by basic surgical trainees. Med Teach. 2004; 26(3): 260–4.
- Kanashiro J, McAleer S, Roff S. Assessing the educational environment in the operating room—a measure of resident perception at one Canadian institution. Surgery 2006; 139(2): 150–8.
)