Strides in Development of Medical Education

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D Candidate in Medical Education, Research Center for Health Services Management, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

2 M.Sc. in Epidemiology, Research Center for Modeling in Health, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

3 PhD in Health Services Management, Assistant Professor, Students' research committee, Vice Chancellor of Research, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

Abstract

  Background & Objective: Understanding the characteristics and criteria that students use to select their teachers is an indicator for evaluating teachers in order to improve the quality and effectiveness of education Hence the aim of this study is to investigate the characteristics of a capable university lecturer from the viewpoints of health services management students in Iranian medical universities   Methods: In this descriptive analytical crosssectional study 582 bachelors degree students of health services management participated Data were collected using a selfdeveloped questionnaire the content validity and reliability of which were confirmed The questionnaire included six main domains namely teaching method personal characteristics evaluation skills scholarly activities interpersonal skills and educational regulations Data were analyzed using Students independent ttest and ANOVA in SPSS software   Results: Our findings suggest that teaching methods (434) interpersonal skills (417) and personal characteristics (411) were the most important domains from the students perspectives On the other hand characteristic such as calling the roll (362) taking midterm quizzes (366) and teachers strictness (371) were the least important domains There was a significant relationship between sex and the educational regulations domain (P = 001) However there was no significant relationship between mean score of domains based on students term of education (P > 005) In total the correlation between all domains revealed 2 distinct categories in the form of personal characteristics and professional commitments   Conclusion: According to our results favorable characteristics of academics especially their individual characteristics and personality are one of the determining factors in achieving educational goals and increasing the quality of education

Keywords

  1. Rahimi M, Zarooj Hosseini R, Darabian M, Taherian A, Khosravi A. Teacher evaluation by students: A comprehensive approach. Strides Dev Med Educ 2012; 9(1): 34-45. [In Persian]
  2. Rusu C, Soitu L, Panaite O. The ideal teacher: Theoretical and investigative approach. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 2012; 33: 1017-21.
  3. Mazloomy Mahmood Abad S, Rahaei Z, Ehrampoush M, Soltani T. The characteristics of an expert faculty member based on view points of medical students. Hormozgan Med J 2010; 14(3): 226-33. [In Persian]
  4. Abedini S, Kamalzadeh H, Abedini S, Aghamolaei T. Perspectives of medical students regarding criteria for a good university professor. Hormozgan Med J 2010; 14(3): 241-5. [In Persian]
  5. Elzubeir MA, Rizk DEE. Identifying characteristics that students, interns and residents look for in their role models. Med Edu 2001; 35(3): 272-7.
  6. Esmaeili M, Haghdoost A, Beigzadeh A, Bahmanmijari B, Bazrafshan A. Personal and scientific characteristics of positive role models among medical educators from the viewpoint of Dentistry and Pharmacy students in Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Iran. Strides Dev Med Educ 2013; 10(3): 180-93. [In Persian]
  7. Gashmard R, Moatamed N, Vahedparast H. Faculty members and students' viewpoints on characteristics of a good university teacher in Boushehr University of Medical Sciences. Iran J Med Educ 2011; 11(1): 48-57. [In Persian]
  8. Mohaddesi H, Feizi A, Safireza S. A comparison of teachers and students opinions toward effective teaching standards in Urmia University of Medical Sciences. J Urmia Nurs Midwifery Fac 2011; 9(35): 464-71. [In Persian]
  9. Paice E, Heard SH, Moss F. How important are role models in making good doctors? BMJ 2002; 325(7366): 707-10.
  10. Azer SA. The qualities of a good teacher: How can they be acquired and sustained? J R Soc Med 2005; 98(2): 67-9.
  11. Markert RJ. What makes a good teacher? Lessons from teaching medical students. Acad Med 2001; 76(8): 809-10.
  12. Ghorbani R, Haji-Aghajani S, Heidarifar M, Andade F, Shams-Abadi M. Viewpoints of nursing and Para-medical students about the features of a good university lecturer. J Semnan Univ Med Sci 2009; 10(2): 77-83. [In Persian]
  13. Zohoor A, Eslaminejad T. Teacher´s effective teaching criteria as viewed by the students of Kerman University of Medical Sciences. J Med Educ 2004; 4(2): 65-70. [In Persian]
  14. Yazigi A, Nasr M, Sleilaty GH, Nemr E. Clinical teachers as role models: perceptions of interns and residents in a Lebanese medical school. Med Educ 2006; 40(7): 65461.
  15. Ramezani T, Dortaj Ravari E. Characteristics of Effective Teachers and Pertinent Effective Educational Factors according to the Teachers and Students’ Point of View in Schools of Nursing, Kerman University of Medical Sciences. Stride Dev Med Educ 2009; 6(2): 139-48. [In Persian]
  16. Ghadami A, Salehi B, Sajadi S, Naji H. Students points of view regarding effective factors in establishing communication between students and faculty members. Iran J Med Educ 2007; 7(1): 149-54. [In Persian]
  17. Mazlomy S, Ehramposh MH, Kalantar M, Karimi H, Harazi MA. Opinion’s students about characteristics of good teachers in Yazd University of Medical Sciences. Yazd Med Sci J 1998; 8 (2):104-8. [In Persian]
  18. Buchel TL, Edwards FD. Characteristics of effective clinical teachers. Fam Med 2005; 37 (1): 30-5.
  19. Khademi Z, Imani E, Naghizadeh F, Askarnia M, Hajizadeh N. Nursing student´s view point about characteristics of ideal clinical instructor. J Urmia Nurs Midwifery Fac 2010; 8(2): 61-8. [In Persian]
  20. Lee WS, Cholowski K, Williams AK. Nursing students’ and clinical educators’ perceptions of characteristics of effective clinical educators in an Australian University school of nursing. J Adv Nurs 2002; 39 (5): 412-20.
  21. Brookfield SD. The skillfull teacher: on Technique, trust, and Responsiveness in the classroom .2nd ed. San Francisco: JossesBass; 2006.
  22. Ramsbottom-Lucier MT, Gillmore GM, Irby DM, Ramsey PG. Evaluation of clinical teaching by general internal medicine faculty in outpatient and inpatient settings. Acad Med 1994; 69(2): 152-4.
  23. Aliasgharpour M, Monjamed Z, Bahrani N. Factors affecting students' evaluation of teachers: Comparing viewpoints of teachers and students. Iran J Med Educ 2010; 10(2): 186-95. [In Persian]
  24. Rad M, Khalili H, Rakhshani M. Effective clinical teacher from Nursing and Midwifery students viewpoints. J Sabzevar Med Univ 2010; 17(4):287-93. [In Persian]
  25. Salehi S, Hassan Zahrayi R, Ghazavi Z, Amini P, Ziaei S. The characteristics of effective clinical teachers as perceived by nursing faculty and students. Iran J Med Educ 2004; 4(1): 37-44. [In Persian]
  26. Benor DE, Leviyof I. The development of students' perceptions of effective teaching: the ideal, best and poorest clinical teacher in nursing. J Nurs Educ 1997; 36(5): 206-11.
  27. Haghdoost AA, Shakibi MR. Medical student and academic staff perceptions of role models: an analytical cross-sectional study. BMC Med Educ 2006; 6(9): 1-6. 28. Wright S, Wong A, Newill C. The impact of role models on medical students. J Gen Intern Med 1997; 12(1): 53-6.
  28. Sharifi M, Jurabchi Z, Alipour Haydari M. Teachers effectiveness on student assessment of teachers and the course. Qazvin Univ Med Sci J 2002; 6 (2): 81-7. [In Persian]