Strides in Development of Medical Education

Document Type : Original Article


1 Medical and Nursing Education, Nursing Research Center, Physiologic Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

2 Medical Surgical Nursing Department, Razi Nursing Faculty , Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

3 Nursing Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Science, Kerman, Iran


Background One of the main goals of action research is to improve the quality of education at both individual and organizational levels. Management enables organizations to improve their performance in areas, which have the greatest impact on students’ learning and empowerment, without compromising the quality of education. Objectives In this study, we aimed to improve the quality of basic clinical skills training for nursing students in an action research, using the available resources. Methods In this action research, a sequential mixed method was applied. The participants in the qualitative phase included experts in the field of education, students, and stakeholders responsible for training at the nursing skills, midwifery, and medical-surgical nursing units of Razi Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery in Kerman, Iran. Assessment of facilities and resources in the quantitative phase was also carried out using a data collection form, a student survey form, and a checklist of basic clinical skills. The stages of action research included action planning for problem-solving, implementation, evaluation, and reflection. The students’ problems with the basic clinical skills and their possible causes were also identified. The most effective and practical solutions for quality improvement included improvement of the educational environment of skill laboratories, followed by the enhancement of skills assessment process using an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Results The conventional method failed in the assessment of students’ competence and lacked adequate objectivity and reliability. A significant difference was observed in the mean scores of basic clinical skills (e.g., injection, measurement of vital signs, and dressing) between the conventional method and OSCE (P < 0.05). From the viewpoint of students, OSCE is more reliable and accurate than the conventional method and uses more suitable educational materials and facilities. Conclusions Based on the findings, by improving the educational environment of clinical skills laboratories and implementation of OSCE, nursing students can translate their knowledge of basic clinical skills into practice. We can also improve the quality of health services and clinical care for patients and reduce the incidence of practical errors made by nursing students.


  1. Sallis E. Total quality management in education. 3rd ed. London: Routledge; 2014. 180 p.
  2. Shoghi Shafagh Aria F, Dorrani K, Lameei A, Labbaf Ghasemi R. [Approaches of iranian medical universities to quality management in education]. Iran J Med Educ. 2011;10(4):350–6. Persian.
  3. Allami A, Sarreshtehdari M, derakhshan F, safdari F. [Innovation in medical education based on quality management model: An experiment in medical school, Ghazvin University of Medical Sciences]. Iran J Med Educ. 2011;11(3):291–3. Persian.
  4. Asadizaker M, Abed Saeedi Z, Abedi HA. [Development of clinical teaching process of the fundamentals of nursing with participatory approach: An action research]. J Qual Res Health Sci. 2014;3(2):175–89.Persian.
  5. Hoyles A, Pollard C, Lees S, Glossop D. Nursing students’ early exposure to clinical practice: An innovation in curriculum development. Nurse Educ Today. 2000;20(6):490–8. doi:10.1054/nedt.1999.0444. [PubMed: 10959138].
  6. Hamidi Y, Tabibi SJ. [A study of TQM implementation outcomes in Hamadan Province, district health systems 2000-2002]. J Hamadan Univ Med Sci. 2004;11(1):37–43. Persian.
  7. Young LE, Paterson BL. Teaching nursing: Developing a student-centered learning environment. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.
  8. Quinn FM. The principles and practice of nurse education. 4th ed. London: NelsonThornes; 2000.
  9. Kanji G. Total quality management: Proceedings of the first world congress. Springer Science & Business Media; 2012. doi: 10.1007/978-94-011-0539-2.
  10. Schuring RW, Luijten H. Reinventing suggestion systems for continuous improvement. Int J Tech Manag. 2001;22(4). doi:10.1504/IJTM.2001.002969.
  11. Davis AH, Kimble LP. Human patient simulation evaluation rubrics for nursing education: Measuring the essentials of baccalaureate education for professional nursing practice. J Nurs Educ. 2011; 50(11): 605–11. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20110715-01. [PubMed: 21751764].
  12. Baxter P. The CCARE model of clinical supervision: Bridging the theory-practice gap. Nurse Educ Pract. 2007;7(2):103–11. doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2006.06.007. [PubMed: 17689431].
  13. Corlett J. The perceptions of nurse teachers, student nurses and preceptors of the theory-practice gap in nurse education. Nurse Educ Today. 2000;20(6):499–505. doi: 10.1054/nedt.1999.0414. [PubMed:10959139].
  14. Soh KL, Davidson PM, Leslie G, Bin Abdul Rahman A. Action research studies in the intensive care setting: A systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2011;48(2):258–68. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.09.014. [PubMed:21030021].
  15. Noohi E, Motesadi M, Haghdoost A. [Clinical teachers ’view points to wards objective structured clinical examination in Kerman University of Medical Science]. Iran J Med Educ. 2008;8(1):113–20. Persian.
  16. Humani Magd Abadi F, Jalalmanesh Sh, Salahshoorian Fard A, Haghani H. [A comparative study of twoOSCE clinical evaluation techniques and gradingin one hospital affiliated to Arak University of Medical Sciences]. Teb va Tazkiye. 2005;14(2):24–9. Persian.
  1. Jalili Z, Nouhi E, Ahmadpour B. [Investigation of medical stagers and interns satisfaction on OSCE as a clinical skill evaluation method in Kerman University of Medical Sciences]. Strides Dev Med Educ. 2005; 2(1):18–24. Persian.
  2. Martinez-Lorente AR, Sánchez-Rodriguez C, Dewhurst FW. The effect of information technologies on TQM: An initial analysis. Int J Prod Econ. 2004;89(1):77–93. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2003.06.001.
  3. Dehghan Nayeri N. Nursing Management Principles. Tehran: Bashari; 2009.
  4. Lamie A. Comprehensive quality management. Principles of use and lessons from an experience. Tehran: Modernmedicine; 2003.
  5. Speziale HS, Streubert HJ, Carpenter DR.Qualitative researchin nursing: Advancing the humanistic imperative. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011.
  6. Mortazavi H, Mohammadnejad E, Tabatabaee A. [Actionresearch: A way fornursing development in future]. J North Khorasan Univ Med Sci. 2014;6(1):215–21. Persian.
  7. Boyer MJ. Brunnerand suddarth’s textbook of medical-surgical nursing. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Lipincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009.
  8. Black JM, Hawks JH. Medical-surgical nursing: Clinical management for positive outcomes. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2009.
  9. Lynn P, LeBon M. Skill check lists for taylor’s clinical nursing skills: A nursing process approach. 3rd ed. Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer; 2011.
  10. Alinier G. Nursing students’ and lecturers’ perspectives of objective structured clinical examination incorporating simulation. Nurse EducToday. 2003;23(6):419–26. doi: 10.1016/S0260-6917(03)00044-3.
  11. Furlong E, Fox P, Lavin M, Collins R. Oncology nursing students’ views of a modified OSCE. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2005;9(4):351–9. doi:10.1016/j.ejon.2005.03.001. [PubMed: 16027036].
  12. Newble D. Techniques for measuring clinical competence: Objective structured clinical examinations. Med Educ. 2004;38(2):199–203.[PubMed: 14871390].
  13. Reza Masouleh S, Zare A, Chehrzad M, Atr Kar Ruoshan Z. [Comparing two methods of evaluation, objective structured practical examination and traditional examination, on the satisfaction of students in Shahid Beheshti Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery]. J Holist Nurs Midwifery. 2008;18(1):22–30. Persian.
  1. Hoseini BL, Mazloum SR, Jafarnejad F, Foroughipour M. Comparison of midwifery students’ satisfaction with direct observation of procedural skills and current methods in evaluation of procedural skills in Mashhad Nursing and Midwifery School. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2013;18(2):94–100. [PubMed: 23983736]. [PubMed Central:PMC3748577].
  1. Chehrzad MM, Mirzaei M, Kazemnejad E. [Comparison between two methods: Objective structured clinical evaluation (OSCE) and traditional on nursing students’ satisfaction]. J Guilan Univ Med Sci. 2004; 13(50):8–13. Persian.