Strides in Development of Medical Education

Document Type : Original Article


1 Medical Education Development Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

2 Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Sirjan Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

3 Education Development Center, Clinical Education Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran


Background Success and academic achievement are among the most important goals of both students and educational systems. Researchers have examined the impact of different factors such as intelligence, personality, attitude, study habits, thinking skills and academic motivation on students’ academic performance. Objectives The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship of motivational beliefs and cognitive and metacognitive strategies with students’ academic achievement. Methods In this descriptive - analytic cross-sectional study, the statistical population included all medical and health students of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (1405 students), 250 of whom were selected according to the Levy and Lemeshow’s formula. After estimating the sample size, the stratified random sampling method was used. To collect data, Pintrich and de Groot’s motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ) was employed. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson’s correlation and independent -test. Results Among the components of cognitive learning strategies, comprehension (r = 0.1266, P < 0.10), and among the components of metacognitive learning strategies, the regulation component (r = 0.049, P < 0.05) had a significant positive correlation with academic performance. Among the components of motivational beliefs, the self-efficacy component (r = 0.173, P < 0.10) showed a significant positive correlation with academic performance. Based on the results of multiple regression analysis, only metacognitive learning strategies had the ability to predict the academic performance of the students. There was no significant difference between male and female students in any of the studied variables. Conclusions Based on the results, students who use more diverse cognitive strategies show better performance than others. Performance is more desirable among those who evaluate their understanding of the content of the course and make more efforts and have more perseverance (regulation) in the learning process. Students who believe in their abilities (self-efficacy) and reinforce these beliefs will have a better academic performance.


  1. Mega C, Ronconi L, De Beni R. What makes a good student? How emotions, self-regulated learning, and motivation contribute to academic achievement. J Educ Psychol. 2014;106(1):121–31. doi:10.1037/a0033546.
  2. Artino AR Jr, Dong T, DeZee KJ, Gilliland WR, Waechter DM, Cruess D, et al. Achievement goal structures and self-regulated learning: Relationships and changes in medical school. Acad Med. 2012;87(10):1375–81. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182676b55. [PubMed: 22914521].
  3. van den Berg G, Coetzee LR. Academic self-concept and motivation as predictors of academic achievement. Int J Educ Sci. 2017;6(3):469–78. doi:10.1080/09751122.2014.11890158.
  4. Soares DL, Lemos GC, Primi R, Almeida LS. The relationship between intelligence and academic achievement throughout middle school:The role of students’ prior academic performance. Learn Indiv Differ.2015;41:73–8. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2015.02.005.
  5. Ghazivakili Z, Norouzi Nia R, Panahi F, Karimi M, Gholsorkhi H, Ahmadi Z. The role of critical thinking skills and learning styles of university students in their academic performance. J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2014;2(3):95–102. [PubMed: 25512928]. [PubMed Central:PMC4235550].
  6. García O, López F, Icaran E, Burgos S. Relationship between general intelligence, competences and academic achievement among university students. Pers Indiv Differ. 2014;60. S67. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.07.296.
  7. Shin HI, Jeon WT, Yang EB. Relationship between learning strategies and academic achievement in medical college and graduate medical school students. Korean J Med Educ. 2010;22(3):197–204. doi:10.3946/kjme.2010.22.3.197. [PubMed: 25813944].
  8. Moldasheva G, Mahmood M. Personality, learning strategies, and academic performance: Evidence from post-Soviet Kazakhstan. Educ +Train. 2014;56(4):343–59. doi: 10.1108/et-10-2012-0101.
  9. Julius M, Evans AS. Study of the relationship between study habits and academic achievement of students: A case of spicer higher secondary school, India. Int J Educ Admin Pol Stud. 2015;7(7):134–41. doi:10.5897/ijeaps2015.0404.
  10. Awang MM, Ahmad AR, Bakar NA, Ghani SA, Yunus ANM, Ibrahim MAH, et al. Students’ attitudes and their academic performance in nationhood education. Int Educ Stud. 2013;6(11):21–8.
  11. Pintrich PR, de Groot EV. Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. J Educ Psychol. 1990;82(1):33–40. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33.
  12. Zimmerman BJ. Motivational sources and outcomes of self-regulated learning and performance: Graduate center of city university of New York. Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance. Routledge; 2011. p. 63–78.
  13. Winne PH. A cognitive and metacognitive analysis of self-regulated learning: Faculty of education, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada. Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance. Routledge; 2011. p. 29–46.
  14. Zimmerman BJ. Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In: Boekaerts M, Pintrich PR, Zeidner M, editors. Handbook of self-regulation. Massachusetts, US: Academic Press; 2000. p. 13–39. doi:10.1016/b978-012109890-2/50031-7.
  15. Pintrich PR, Smith DAF, Garcia T, McKeachie WJ. Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Educ Psychol Meas. 2016;53(3):801–13. doi:10.1177/0013164493053003024.
  16. Weinstein CE, Acee TW, Jung JH. Self-regulation and learning strategies. New Dir Teach Learn. 2011; 2011(126):45–53. doi: 10.1002/tl.443.
  17. Bortoletto D, Boruchovitch E. Learning strategies and emotional regulation of pedagogy students. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto).2013;23(55):235–42. doi: 10.1590/1982-43272355201311.
  18. Msayar H, Akhmal R, Mardhiana R. The relationship between test anxiety and academic self - regulated learning among foundation students in Iium. Sci J Educ. 2016;4(2):39. doi:10.11648/j.sjedu.20160402.14.
  19. Çetin B. Academic motivation and self-regulated learning in predicting academic achievement in college. J Int Educ Res. 2015;11(2):95–106.
  20. Mousoulides N, Philippou G, editors. Students’ motivational beliefs, self-regulation strategies and mathematics achievement. Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. 2005; Melbourne, Australia. 2005. p. 321–8.
  21. Kitsantas A, Zimmerman BJ. College students’ homework and academic achievement: The mediating role of self-regulatory beliefs. Metacogn Learn. 2008;4(2):97–110. doi: 10.1007/s11409-008-9028-y.
  22. Dignath C, Buettner G, Langfeldt HP. How can primary school students learn self-regulated learning strategies most effectively? A meta-analysis on self-regulation training programmes. Educ Res Rev. 2008;3(2):101–29. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2008.02.003.
  1. Pintrich PR. Understanding self-regulated learning. New Dir Teach Learn. 1995;1995(63):3–12. doi:10.1002/tl.37219956304.
  2. Bromme R, Pieschl S, Stahl E. Epistemological beliefs are standards for adaptive learning: A functional theory about epistemological beliefs and metacognition. Metacogn Learn. 2009;5(1):7–26. doi:10.1007/s11409-009-9053-5.
  3. Schunk DH, Usher EL. Assessing self-efficacy for self-regulated learning. In: Zimmerman BJ, Schunk D, editors. Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance. New York: Routledge; 2011. p. 282–97. doi:10.4324/9780203839010.
  4. King RB, Areepattamannil S. What students feel in school influences the strategies they use for learning: Academic emotions and cognitive/meta-cognitive strategies. J Pac Rim Psychol. 2014;8(1):18–27.doi: 10.1017/prp.2014.3.
  5. Neuville S, Frenay M, Bourgeois E. Task value, self-efficacy and goal orientations: Impact on self-regulated learning, choice and performance among university students. Psychol Belg. 2007;47(1):95–117. doi:10.5334/pb-47-1-95.
  6. Pekrun R, Goetz T, Titz W, Perry RP. Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educ Psychol. 2002;37(2):91–105. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3702_4.
  7. Henrich J, Heine SJ, Norenzayan A. Most people are notWEIRD.Nature. 2010;466(7302):29. doi:10.1038/466029a. [PubMed: 20595995].
  8. Levy PS, Lemeshow S. Sampling of populations: Methods and applications. 4th ed. New Jersey, US: John Wiley & Sons; 2013.
  9. Farhadinia M, Qulipor P, Jalilvand M. [Relationship learning strategies and academic self-efficacy with academic achievement of students in Lorestan University of Medical Sciences in 2016]. Yafte. 2018;19(5):9–17. Persian.
  1. Colorado JT. The relationship of self-regulated learning and academic performance in an online course environment [dissertation]. Lawrence, Kansas, U.S: University of Kansas; 2006.
  2. Valkyrie KT. Self-regulated learning: An examination of motivational, cognitive, resource management, metacognitive components and academic outcomes with open admissions community college students [dissertation]. Houston, Texas, U.S: University of Houston; 2006.
  3. Bouffard-Bouchard T, Parent S, Lavirée S. Self-regulation on a conceptformation task among average and gifted students. J Exp Child Psychol.1993;56(1):115–34. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1993.1028.
  4. Ahmed W, van der Werf G, Kuyper H, Minnaert A. Emotions, self-regulated learning, and achievement in mathematics: A growth curve analysis. J Educ Psychol. 2013;105(1):150–61. doi:10.1037/a0030160.
  5. Abedini Y, Bagherian R, Kadkhodaie MS. [The relation among motivational beliefs, cognitive and metacognitive strategies and academic achievement: Testing of alternative models]. J Adv Cogn Sci.2010;12(2):34–48. Persian.
  1. Liem AD, Lau S, Nie Y. The role of self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals in predicting learning strategies, task disengagement, peer relationship, and achievement outcome. Contemp Educ Psychol.2008;33(4):486–512. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.08.001.
  2. Pakdaman Savoji A, Beheshteh N, Boreiri L. Relationship between epistemological beliefs, self-regulated learning strategies and academic achievement. Procedia - Soc Behav Sci. 2013;84:1160–5. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.719.
  3. Sungur S, Kahraman N. The contribution of motivational beliefs to students’ metacognitive strategy use. Educ Sci. 2011;36(160).
  4. Pintrich PR. The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining selfregulated learning.IntJ Educ Res. 1999;31(6):459–70. doi: 10.1016/s0883-0355(99)00015-4.
  5. Al-Harthy IS, Was CA, Isaacson RM. Goals, efficacy and metacognitive self-regulation a path analysis. Int J Educ. 2010;2(1). doi:10.5296/ije.v2i1.357.
  6. Alyami M, Melyani Z, Al Johani A, Ullah E, Alyami H, Sundram F, et al. The impact of self-esteem, academic self-efficacy and perceived stress on academic performance: A cross-sectional study of Saudi psychology students. Europ J Educ Sci. 2017;4(3). doi: 10.19044/ejes.v4no3a5.
  7. Zajacova A, Lynch SM, Espenshade TJ. Self-efficacy, stress, and academic success in college. Res High Educ. 2005;46(6):677–706. doi:10.1007/s11162-004-4139-z.
  8. Domenech-Betoret F, Abellan-Rosello L, Gomez-Artiga A. Self-efficacy, satisfaction, and academic achievement: The mediator role of students’ expectancy-value beliefs. Front Psychol. 2017;8:1193. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01193. [PubMed: 28769839]. [PubMed Central:PMC5513915].
  1. Villavicencio FT, Bernardo ABI. Negative emotions moderate the relationship between self-efficacy and achievement of Filipino students. Psychol Stud. 2013;58(3):225–32. doi: 10.1007/s12646-013-0193-y.
  2. Sadi O, Uyar M. The relationship between self-efficacy, self-regulated learning strategies and achievement: A path model. J Baltic Sci Educ. 2013;12(1):21–33.
  3. Diseth A. Self-efficacy, goal orientations and learning strategies asmediators between preceding and subsequent academic achievement. Learn Indiv Differ. 2011;21(2):191–5. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2011.01.003.
  4. KomarrajuM, Nadler D. Self-efficacy and academic achievement: Why do implicit beliefs, goals, and effort regulation matter? Learn Indiv Differ. 2013;25:67–72. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2013.01.005.
  5. Lee W, Lee M-J, Bong M. Testing interest and self-efficacy as predictors of academic self-regulation and achievement. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2014;39(2):86–99. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.02.002.
  6. Chemers MM, Hu L-T, Garcia BF. Academic self-efficacy and first year college student performance and adjustment. J Educ Psychol. 2001;93(1):55–64. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.55.
  7. Bandura A, Freeman WH, Lightsey R. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. J Cognit Psychother. 1999;13(2):158–66. doi: 10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158.
  8. Schunk DH. Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educ Psychol. 1991;26(3-4):207–31. doi:10.1080/00461520.1991.9653133.
  9. Schunk DH, Ertmer PA. Self-regulation and academic learning: Selfefficacy enhancing interventions. In: Boekaerts M, Pintrich PR, Zeidner M, editors. Handbook of self-regulation. Massachusetts, US: Academic Press; 2000. p. 631–49. doi: 10.1016/b978-012109890-2/50048-2.
  10. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977; 84(2): 191–215. [PubMed: 847061].
  11. Pintrich PR. A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. J Educ Psychol. 2003;95(4):667–86. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667.
  12. Kurbanoglu NI, Akim A. The relationships between university students’ chemistry laboratory anxiety, attitudes, and self-efficacy beliefs. Aust J Teach Educ. 2010;35(8). doi:10.14221/ajte.2010v35n8.4.
  13. Artino AR Jr. Academic self-efficacy: From educational theory to instructional practice. Perspect Med Educ. 2012;1(2):76–85. doi:10.1007/s40037-012-0012-5. [PubMed: 23316462]. [PubMed Central:PMC3540350].
  14. Margolis H, McCabe PP. Self-efficacy: A key to improving the motivation of struggling learners. Clear House. 2010;77(6):241–9. doi:10.3200/tchs.77.6.241-249.
  15. Lynch DJ. Motivational factors, learning strategies and resource management as predictors of course grades.Coll StudentJ. 2006;40(2):423–8.
  16. Pajares F. Gender and perceived self-efficacy in self-regulated learning. Theory Pract. 2002; 41(2): 116–25. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4102_8.
  17. Anderman EM, Young AJ. Motivation and strategy use in science: Individual differences and classroom effects. J Res Sci Teach. 1994;31(8):811–31. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660310805.
  18. Linn MC, Hyde JS. Gender, mathematics, and science. Educ Res. 1989;18(8):17. doi:10.2307/1176462.
  19. Zimmerman BJ, Martinez-Pons M. Student differences in selfregulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. J Educ Psychol. 1990;82(1):51–9. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.51.
  1. Peklaj C, Pecjak S. Emotions, motivation and self-regulation in boys’ and girls’ learning mathematics. Horiz Psychol. 2011;20(3):33–58.