Strides in Development of Medical Education

Document Type : Original Article


1 Department of Psychology, Bandar Abbas Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bandar Abbas, Iran

2 Faculty of Psychology, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran

3 Department of Educational Sciences, University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas, Iran


Background Academic commitment as a new specialized issue has attracted the attention of educational researchers. Despite of the conducting relevant studies, it was more considered by Human-Vogel and Rabe. Their designed research tool has not yet been used in Iran. Objectives The purpose of this study was to investigate the factor structure and reliability of this tool in Iranian learners. Methods The primary tool consisted of 30 items and 5 dimensions (students’ satisfaction with their studies, level of commitment, investment, quality of alternatives, and meaningfulness). In this cross-sectional study, 449 pre-university students of Bandar Abbas city were selected through multi-stage sampling. Data were analyzed using AMOS and SPSS software. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to examine factor structure. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient and Gottman and Spearman-Brown split-half coefficients, were used to test the reliability. Results After examination the validity of the tool, five items were excluded and finally a questionnaire including 25 questions was obtained. Beta coefficients were greater than 0.4. Model fit indices, including root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), Comparative fit index (CFI), goodness of fit index (GFI), adjusted goodness of fit index (AGFI), normed fit index (NFI), incremental fit index (IFI), and Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) were obtained 0.04, 0.95, 0.91, 0.90, 0.90, 0.95, and 0.94, respectively, indicating the fitness of this five-factor tool. A Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.87, a Gottman’s split-half of 0.65, and a Spearman-Brown split-half of 0.68 were obtained, indicating the appropriate reliability of the instrument. Conclusions Based on the results, the final version of the tool seems to be suitable for assessing academic commitment in Iranian learners in the Iran educational systems.


  1. Merriam-Webster online dictionary. 2019. Available from: https://www.
  2. Shokouhi Fard S, Hamid N, Sudani M. [The effect of hardiness training on quality of life of teacher training female students]. J Manag Syst. 2015;14(52):14–25. Persian.
  3. Samawi SAW. [The causal relationships between future orientation, academic self-efficacy beliefs, school links, and academic performance with mediation of hope and mental health among high school students in Bandar Abbas] [dissertation]. Ahvaz, Iran: Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz; 2012. Persian.
  4. Zarandi M, Hashemianfar SA, Kianpour M. [Women and social engagement marital engagement; case study: Isfahan city]. Q J Cult Strat. 2017;10(38):127–63. Persian.
  5. Libbey HP. Measuring student relationships to school: Attachment, bonding, connectedness, and engagement. J Sch Health. 2004;74(7):274–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2004.tb08284.x. [PubMed:15493704].
  6. Hashemi T, Vahedi S, Mohebbi M. [The structural relationship of school and parental bonding with academic satisfaction and academic control: The mediating role of academic self-efficacy]. Bi-Q J Cognit Strat Learn. 2016;3(5):1–20. Persian.
  7. Azimi D. [The effectiveness of teaching psychological hardiness training on academic exercise and social acceptance] [dissertation]. Tehran: Allameh Tabatabaei University; 2016. Persian.
  8. Aghajani MJ, Rahbar T, Moghtader L. [The relationship of hopefulness and hardiness with general health in women with breast cancer]. J Guilan Univ Med Sci. 2018;26(104):41–9. Persian.
  9. Viljoen B. The relationship between academic commitment and resilience for education students at the University of Pretoria [dissertation]. Pretoria: Faculty of Education, University of Pretoria; 2015.
  10. Human-Vogel S. A self-regulatory perspective on commitment in academic and interpersonal contexts. In: Wissing MP, editor. Well-being research in South Africa. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2013. p. 517–37. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6368-5_24.
  11. Human-Vogel S, Rabe P. Measuring self-differentiation and academic commitment in university students: A case study of education and engineering students. S Afr J Psychol. 2014;45(1):60–70. doi:10.1177/0081246314548808.
  12. Mazlom Bafroe N, Shams Esfand Abadi H, Jalali MR, Afkhami Ardakani M, Dadgari A. [The relationship between resilience and hardiness in patients with type 2 diabetes in Yazd]. J Shahid Sadoughi Univ Med Sci. 2015;23(2):1858–65. Persian.
  13. Wentzel KR, Battle A, Russell SL, Looney LB. Social supports from teachers and peers as predictors of academic and social motivation. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2010;35(3):193–202. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.03.002.
  14. Ito A. Enhancing school connectedness in Japan: The role of homeroom teachers in establishing a positive classroom climate. Asian J Counsel. 2011;18(1):41–62.
  15. Maddi SR, Harvey RH, Khoshaba DM, Fazel M, Resurreccion N. Hardiness training facilitates performance in college. J Positive Psychol. 2009;4(6):566–77. doi: 10.1080/17439760903157133.
  16. Hassanvandi S, Nooripour R, Soheilizadeh S, Siafi P, Hosseinian S, Jamshidi MA. [Pattern of causal relationships of academic self-handicapping of students]. Bimonth Educ Strateg Med Sci. 2016;9(4):266–76. Persian.
  17. Martin AJ, Colmar SH, Davey LA, Marsh HW. Longitudinal modelling of academic buoyancy and motivation: Do the ’5Cs’ hold up over time? Br J Educ Psychol. 2010;80(Pt 3):473–96. doi:10.1348/000709910X486376. [PubMed: 20170601].
  18. Davoudvandi F, Shokri O. [Cognitive assessment processes excitement progress and academic commitment: Interactive analysis]. Evol Psychol Iran Psychol. 2017;13(50):183–98. Persian.
  19. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 4th ed.New York: Guilford Pub; 2015.
  20. Garver MS, Mentzer JT. Logistics research methods: Employing structural equation modeling to test for construct validity. J Bus Logist.1999;20(1):33.