Comparison of Team-Based Learning and Lecturing Methods in Pharmacological Biotechnology for Pharmacology Students

Sabouri Shahrbabak, Salehe; Dehghani, Mahmood Reza

doi:10.5812/sdme.64093

Comparison of Team-Based Learning and Lecturing Methods in Pharmacological Biotechnology for Pharmacology Students

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Salehe Sabouri Shahrbabak ¹

Mahmood Reza Dehghani ²

¹ Ph.D. in Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Assistant Professor, Herbal and Traditional Medicine Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

² M.Sc. in Medical Education, Instructor, Medical Education Department, Education Development Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

https://doi.org/10.5812/sdme.64093

Abstract

Background Active learning methods are strategies used by most universities worldwide to enhance the problem-solving ability and develop critical thinking in students. Team-based learning (TBL) is one of these methods, in which students study the lesson prior to discussion. At the beginning of the session, the individual readiness assurance test (iRAT) is given to students, and then they answer the same questions through discussion in a team. Finally, problems are resolved by the teacher and results are given to students. Methods In the current study, 30 pharmacology students were randomly assigned to two groups of 16 and 14 subjects. The educational content of pharmaceutical biotechnology was given to the 16- and 14-subject groups using traditional lecturing and TBL methods, respectively. Finally, both groups were assessed and compared based on a same method. Results The average scores of the lecturing and TBL groups were 6.77 ± 1.97 and 8.32 ± 2.65 out of 13.75, respectively (6.25 scores belonged to class activities, which were not included in comparisons). No significant difference was observed between the mean score of groups (P = 0.07), although the difference was very close to significant, which can be attributed to the current study’s small sample size. One subject in the TBL group and six in the lecturing group failed to pass the course; the difference between the groups in this regard was noticeable. Conclusions Although results of the current study showed no significant superiority of TBL over the lecturing method, most students were satisfied with the TBL method. Hence, it is recommended to employ this method with freshmen.

Keywords

Team-based Learning

Pharmacology

Readiness Assurance Test

Pharmaceutical Biotechnology

Bleske BE, Remington TL, Wells TD, Dorsch MP, Guthrie SK, Stumpf JL, et al. Team-based learning to improve learning outcomes in a therapeutics course sequence. Am J Pharm Educ. 2014;78(1):13. doi:

10.5688/ajpe78113. [PubMed: 24558281].

Haidet P, O’Malley KJ, Richards B. An initial experience with "team learning" in medical education. Acad Med. 2002;77(1):40–4. [PubMed:11788321].
Nieder GL, Parmelee DX, Stolfi A, Hudes PD. Team-based learning in a medical gross anatomy and embryology course. Clin Anat. 2005;18(1):56–63. doi: 10.1002/ca.20040. [PubMed: 15597377].
Farland MZ, Sicat BL, Franks AS, Pater KS, Medina MS, Persky AM. Best practices for implementing team-based learning in pharmacy education. Am J Pharm Educ. 2013;77(8):177. doi: 10.5688/ajpe778177. [PubMed:24159218].
Allen RE, Copeland J, Franks AS, Karimi R, McCollum M, Riese D2, et al. Team-based learning in US colleges and schools of pharmacy. Am J Pharm Educ. 2013;77(6):115. doi: 10.5688/ajpe776115. [PubMed:23966718].
Ofstad W, Brunner LJ. Team-based learning in pharmacy education. Am J Pharm Educ. 2013;77(4):70. doi: 10.5688/ajpe77470. [PubMed:23716738].
Letassy NA, Fugate SE, Medina MS, Stroup JS, Britton ML. Using teambased learning in an endocrine module taught across two campuses. Am J Pharm Educ. 2008;72(5):103. [PubMed: 19214257].
Conway SE, Johnson JL, Ripley TL. Integration of team-based learning strategies into a cardiovascular module. Am J Pharm Educ. 2010;74(2):35. [PubMed: 20414450].
Grady SE. Team-based learning in pharmacotherapeutics. Am J Pharm Educ. 2011;75(7):136. doi: 10.5688/ajpe757136. [PubMed: 21969722].
Persky AM. The impact of team-based learning on a foundational pharmacokinetics course. Am J Pharm Educ. 2012;76(2):31. doi:10.5688/ajpe76231. [PubMed: 22438603].
Addo-Atuah J. Performance and perceptions of pharmacy students using team-based learning (TBL) within a global health course. Innovation Pharmacy. 2011;2(2):1–15.
Vaezi AA, Azizian F, Kopayehzadeh J. Survey compare team based learning and lecture teaching method, on learning-teaching process nursing student’s, in surgical and internal diseases course (In Persian). J Med Edu Dev. 2015;10(3):246–54.
Hassanzadeh G, Abolhasani F, Mirzazadeh A, Alizadeh M. Team-based learning; a new strategy in integrated medical curriculum: the experience of school of medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (In Persian). Iran J Med Educ. 2013;13(7):601–10.
Aghghaleh H, Isfahani JK, Jazayeri S, Aryaeian N. The effect of team-based training on Iran University of Medical Sciences nursing students’ critical thinking in 2014 (In Persian). J Med Edu Dev.2017; 11(3): 186–200.
Bahador H, Feizi A, Nabizadeh M. A study on the midwifery student’s perception of the children’s care course by using team-based learning in coparison with conventional learning (In Persian). J Urmia Nurs Midwifery Faculty. 2015;13(6):525–34.
Jafari Z. A comparison of conventional lecture and team-based learning methods in terms of student learning and teaching satisfaction. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2014;28:5. [PubMed: 25250250].