Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1 Department of Infectious Disease, Imam Hossein Medical and Educational Center, Deputy of Education, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Sports Medicine, Imam Hossein Medical and Educational Center, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3 Ph.D. in Medical laboratory Sciences, Imam Hossein Medical and Educational Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4 Software Engineer, Imam Hossein Medical and Educational Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused many changes in the educational structure of hospitals, so much so that the educational systems tend to use online education. In this regard, the Deputy of Education of Imam Hossein Hospital designed an application to expand this form of education in the hospital.
Objectives:The purpose of this study was to review various software used in online education in Imam Hossein Hospital, to obtain the strengths and weaknesses.
Methods: The present investigation was a scholarly approach study performed in Imam Hossein Hospital in Tehran in several stages during the COVID- 19 outbreak (beginning of March 2020). First, the necessary infrastructure was examined through meetings held in the educational deputy of the hospital. Then, a system was created by the deputy by which teachers could upload educational files in different formats. Finally, the files uploaded by the faculty members were evaluated by the observers.
Results: In this study, professors uploaded 234 files in various formats to the hospital website. PowerPoint was the most frequent format in these files, of which 105 (44.8%) were uploaded. 42 (17.9%) files were sent as images. 27 (11.5%) were multimedia files in different formats. And 17 files (7.2%) were about the evaluation of the residents, which was conducted via Google form. Other files in total 43 (18.3%) included other formats. The average score of the educational files uploaded by the faculty members was 17.79 ± 3.26.
Conclusion: Since medical education is mostly based on students' clinical practice, the lack of an exclusive platform in this area is quite noticeable. The present study showed that professors at first do not necessarily choose the best platform for providing online education, but the most familiar software available. This trend, however, may change with experience. Therefore, it is better to suggest the best platform for professors from the very beginning of online education
Keywords
January 12]. Available from: www.who.int/csr/don/12-january-2020-
novel-coronavirus-china/en/.
2. Abdi M. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in Iran:
Actions and problems. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2020; 1-2. doi:
10.1017/ice.2020.86 PMCID:PMC7137533 PMID:32192541
3. Crawford J, Butler-Henderson K, Rudolph J, Malkawi B, Glowatz M,
Burton R, et al. COVID-19: 20 Countries' Higher Education Intra-Period
Digital Pedagogy Responses. Journal of Applied Teaching and Learning.
2020; 3(1): 1-20. doi: 10.37074/jalt.2020.3.1.7.
4. Stojanovska M, Tingle G, Tan L, Ulrey L, Simonson-Shick S, Mlakar
J, et al. Mixed reality anatomy using Microsoft HoloLens and cadaveric
dissection: a comparative effectiveness study. Medical Science Educator.
2019; 30: 173-8. doi:10.1007/s40670-019-00834-x
5. Hanna MG, Ahmed I, Nine J, Prajapati S, Pantanowitz L. Augmented
reality technology using Microsoft HoloLens in anatomic pathology.
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2018; 142(5): 638-44. doi:10.5858/arpa.2017-
0189-OA.
6. Condino S, Turini G, Parchi PD, Viglialoro RM, Piolanti N, Gesi M,
et al. How to build a patient-specific hybrid simulator for Orthopaedic
open surgery: benefits and limits of mixed-reality using the Microsoft
HoloLens. J Healthc Eng. 2018; 2018 . doi: 10.1155/2018/5435097
PMCID: PMC6236521, PMID: 30515284
7. google. [Available from: https://www.google.com/intl/fa_ALL/
drive/.
8. Porpiglia F, Checcucci E, Autorino R, Amparore D, Cooperberg
MR, Ficarra V, et al. Traditional and Virtual Congress Meetings During
the COVID-19 Pandemic and the Post-COVID-19 Era: Is it Time to
Change the Paradigm?. Eur Urol. 2020: 78(3): 301-3. doi: 10.1016/j.
eururo.2020.04.018 PMCID:PMC7158826 PMID: 32334884
9. Jell A, Vogel T, Ostler D, Marahrens N, Wilhelm D, Samm N, et al.
5th-Generation Mobile Communication: Data Highway for Surgery 4.0.
Surg Technol Int. 2019; 35: 36-42.
10. Augestad KM, Butt K, Ignjatovic D, Keller DS, Kiran R. Video-based
coaching in surgical education: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Surg Endosc. 2020; 34(2): 521-35. doi:10.1007/s00464-019-07265-0.
PMID: 31748927
11. Jayakumar N, Brunckhorst O, Dasgupta P, Khan MS, Ahmed K.
e-Learning in surgical education: a systematic review. J Surg Educ. 2015;
72(6): 1145-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.05.008.
12. Mars M, Scott RE. Whatsapp in clinical practice: A literature . The
Promise of New Technologies in an Age of New Health Challenges. 2016;
82-90.
13. Masoni M, Guelfi MR. WhatsApp and other messaging apps in
medicine: opportunities and risks. Intern Emerg Med. 2020; 15(2): 171-
3. doi: 10.1007/s11739-020-02292-5.
14. Villa A, Sankar V, Shiboski C. Tele (oral) medicine: A new approach
during the COVID‐19 crisis. Oral Dis. 2020. doi: 10.1111/odi.13364.
PMCID: PMC7264524 PMID: 32307831
15. Edirippulige S, Levandovskaya M, Prishutova A. A qualitative study
of the use of Skype for psychotherapy consultations in the Ukraine. J
Telemed Telecare. 2013; 19(7): 376-8. doi:10.1177/1357633X13506523.
PMID: 24218348
16. Chick RC, Clifton GT, Peace KM, Propper BW, Hale DF, Alseidi
AA, et al. Using Technology to Maintain the Education of Residents
During the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Surg Educ. 2020; 77(4): 729-32. doi:
10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.03.018 PMCID: PMC7270491 PMID: 32253133
17. Connect A. Adobe Connect. Recuperado el. 2014; 1.
)