Document Type : Review
Authors
1 M.S.c. Student of Health Information Technology, Student Research Committee, Department of Health Information Technology, School of Paramedical Sciences, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
2 Ph.D. in Knowledge and Information Science (Information Retrieval), Education Development Center, Gonabad University of Medical Sciences, Gonabad, Iran
3 B.Sc. Student of Nursing, Department of Nursing, Student Research Committee, Ferdows School of Paramedical and Health, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran
4 M.Sc. Student of Geriatric Nursing, Student Research Committee, Department of Internal Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
Highlights
Fatemeh Ameri: (Google Scholar) (PubMed)
Meisam Dastani: (Google Scholar) (PubMed)
Abazar Gholami: (Google Scholar) (PubMed)
Maedeh Heidary: (Google Scholar) (PubMed)
Keywords
Background
The outbreak of Covid-19 in December 2019 (1) affected education systems worldwide and led to the temporary closure of schools and universities and the cancellation of in-person classes (2). Instead of canceling their classes, most educational centers encouraged the teachers to provide educational materials and hold classes through virtual education and virtual training (3). On this basis and considering the need to observe social virtually and break the chain of transmission, virtual education has become more prevalent than ever (4, 5). The WHO also identified virtual education, such as radio, television, the Internet, and other devices, as one of the best ways to continue education during the COVID-19 crisis (6).
Due to the growth of communication technologies, teachers have been encouraged to hold virtual classes to fill the face-to-face education gaps (7). Undoubtedly, virtual education has provided an extensive range of benefits in the COVID-19 conditions, the most important of which is the provision of the possibility for students and trainers to learn and train at any time and place, creating discussions and virtual groups separate from the classroom, and holding virtual tests (8, 9). Nevertheless, virtual education has some challenges, including limited access to physical facilities such as laboratories, lack of practical classes, and loss of student interest in learning (8, 9).
In addition, at the beginning of the crisis and virtual education, teachers and students faced challenges such as a lack of familiarity of students and teachers with virtual education platforms and a lack of correct installation of related software on computers and smartphones (7). Keshavarzi et al. addressed the inadequate organizational culture, unsatisfactory infrastructure, neglect the intellectual property rights, and disregard for ethics as among the problems and challenges of virtual education during COVID-19 (10). Accordingly, Contreras et al. claimed that universities should have all the necessary facilities and components for online education and a formal regulation for virtual education (11). Another study also stated the challenges of virtual education, such as professors' inability to teach the material in virtual form, lack of proper feedback from students, lack of discipline, and the possibility of student cheating (12).
Limitation in practical exercises, such as weakness in virtual clinical simulation systems, has also been one of the important challenges in different fields, for example, nursing education (13, 14). In another viewpoint, sociocultural issues related to media and poor media literacy of parents are another major challenge in virtual education (15). Due to the unpreparedness of educational centers in the provision of suitable training platforms and the unfamiliarity of trainers with virtual education methods, the need for this kind of education during the COVID-19 crisis faced serious challenges (16, 17).
Objectives
Many studies have been conducted on virtual Education During Coronavirus Disease 2019 worldwide. Some studies have investigated the challenges students face during COVID-19, while some have reported challenges teachers face in virtual education. According to the research of the researchers, no comprehensive study was found that examined the challenges of professors during the corona epidemic and studied their challenges. Therefore, this study aims to systematically review the challenges experienced by teachers in virtual education during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Identifying the challenges of virtual education based on the point of view of teachers who were at the head of education during the Covid-19 era can help to increase the productivity of virtual education and solve the challenges. Therefore, this review study was designed and implemented to explain university teachers' opinions about the challenges of virtual education during the Covid-19 pandemic.
Methods
The present study is a systematic review based on the PRISMA guideline (18). This review aimed to investigate teachers' challenges in virtual education during the COVID-19 pandemic. For this purpose, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched to retrieve English articles. The search of references in the mentioned scientific databases and based on the search strategy presented in table 1 was performed independently by three researchers. If there was a discrepancy, it was referred to the fourth person. The searches were conducted from 1 December 2019 to 11 November 2021.
Table 1. Reference search strategy in scientific databases
|
Time limitation |
From 1 December 2019 to 11 November 2021 |
Number of records |
|
Language limitation |
English |
|
|
Database |
PubMed, Scopus, Web of science |
|
|
PubMed |
((((("Problems") OR ("Challenges")) OR ("Barriers")) OR ("Obstacles")) AND ((((((("Remote learning") OR (" Online learning")) OR ("Tele education")) OR (" Virtual teaching")) OR ("Virtual university")) OR (" E-learning")) OR ("Virtual education"))) AND (((((((((((((("COVID-19 ") ) OR ("COVID 19")) OR (" 2019-nCoV ")) OR ("2019 nCoV ")) OR ("Coronavirus Disease-19")) OR ("Coronavirus Disease 19")) OR ("2019 Novel Coronavirus ")) OR (" 2019-nCoV Disease")) OR ("Coronavirus Disease 2019")) OR ("SARS Coronavirus 2")) OR ("SARS-CoV-2")) OR (" SARS CoV 2")) |
768 |
|
Scopus |
TITLE-ABS-KEY-AUTH("Problems" ) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY-AUTH("Challenges" ) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY-AUTH("Barriers") OR TITLE-ABS-KEY-AUTH("Obstacles") AND TITLE-ABS-KEY-AUTH( "Remote learning" ) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY-AUTH( " Online learning") OR TITLE-ABS-KEY-AUTH( "Tele education") OR TITLE-ABS-KEY-AUTH("Virtual teaching" ) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY-AUTH(" Virtual university") OR TITLE-ABS-KEY-AUTH(" E-learning" ) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY-AUTH("Virtual education") AND TITLE-ABS-KEY-AUTH("Sars Cov 2") OR TITLE-ABS-KEY-AUTH("SARS Coronavirus 2") OR TITLE-ABS-KEY-AUTH("Coronavirus Disease 2019") OR TITLE-ABS-KEY-AUTH("Coronavirus Disease-19") OR TITLE-ABS-KEY-AUTH("2019 nCoV ") OR TITLE-ABS-KEY-AUTH((" 2019-nCoV ") OR TITLE-ABS-KEY-AUTH("Covid 19") OR TITLE-ABS-KEY-AUTH("COVID-19 ") OR TITLE-ABS-KEY-AUTH("2019 Novel Coronavirus ") OR TITLE-ABS-KEY-AUTH("SARS-CoV-2") |
551 |
|
Web of science |
TITLE: ("Problems") OR TITLE: ("Challenges ") OR TITLE: ("Barriers") OR TITLE: ("Obstacles") AND TITLE: ("Remote learning ") OR TITLE: (" Online learning ") OR TITLE: ("Tele education ") OR TITLE: ("Virtual teaching ") OR TITLE: ("Virtual university ") OR TITLE: ("E-learning ") OR TITLE: ("Virtual education ") AND TITLE: ("COVID 19") OR TITLE: ("COVID-19") OR TITLE: ("2019-nCoV") OR TITLE: ("2019 nCoV") OR TITLE: ("Coronavirus Disease-19") OR TITLE: ("Coronavirus Disease 19") OR TITLE: ("2019 Novel Coronavirus") OR TITLE: ("2019-nCoV Disease") OR TITLE: ("SARS Coronavirus 2") OR TITLE: ("SARS-CoV-2") OR TITLE: ("SARS CoV 2") |
900 |
Table 2. PICOs, inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria applied to database search
|
PICOS |
Inclusion Criteria |
Exclusion Criteria |
|
Population |
university teachers |
Student and other degrees |
|
Intervention |
COVID-19 pandemic |
Other times |
|
Comparison |
- |
- |
|
Outcome |
challenges in virtual education |
Other outcome |
|
Study design |
original research articles |
short articles, letters to the editor, conference abstracts, review articles |
The criteria for inclusion and exclusion are state in table 2. After selecting the studies, according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, data was collected using a data extraction form based on the study's objectives. The collected data were analyzed using the content analysis method.
Quality Evaluation and Extraction
Following selecting the relevant studies based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, the data was collected using a form according to the study objectives. The articles' titles, abstracts, and full texts were reviewed independently by researchers using the STROBE checklist (19). In this way, the articles confirmed in at least 20 of the 22 items in the checklist were included in the study; then, the desired data were extracted from eligible articles and recorded in Excel software.
The possible discrepancies were referred to another person. The data extraction table included the following parts: authors' name and year of the study, Research Type, Country, Statistical Population, Platforms, and Challenges.
Results
In the initial review of three databases, 2219 articles were retrieved and entered into a reference management software named EndNote Ver.20. After removing duplicate and irrelevant items based on the evaluation of the title, abstract and full text, finally, 17 articles were selected, which were published to introduce teachers' challenges in the COVID-19 period. Figure 1 shows the search and selection process of articles.
.jpg)
Table 3. Results of reviewing the selected studies
|
Author/ Publication year |
Country |
Population |
Challenges |
|
(Zalat et al, 2021) (20) |
Egypt |
346 staff in both basic sciences (such as anatomy, physiology, pathology, histology, biochemistry, parasitology, pharmacology, microbiology) and clinical departments |
Unstable internet connection |
|
Inadequate computer labs |
|||
|
Limited number of computers/laptops |
|||
|
Technical issues |
|||
|
(Yu et al, 2021) (21) |
United States |
18 faculty members |
Lack of interaction and discussion |
|
Lack of familiarity with the teaching method |
|||
|
Solutions: Technology support (100%), Advice from colleagues (66.7%), Holding workshops of Zoom software (61.1%) |
|||
|
(Thaheem et al, 2021) (22) |
Pakistan and Indonesia |
20 teachers (10 from Pakistan and |
Feeling confused |
|
Not ready to change the face-to-face |
|||
|
Lack of readiness to teach online |
|||
|
Technological challenges, such as slow internet |
|||
|
Lack of training the teachers to use technology |
|||
|
Solutions: Both countries should focus on the Administrators should consider the problems of |
|||
|
(Romaniuket al , 2020) (23) |
Poland |
Teachers working at the Maria Grzegorzewski University |
Internet connection problems |
|
Hardware problems |
|||
|
Software problems |
|||
|
Lack of experience in online teaching |
|||
|
Solutions: Renovating the existing solutions, Investing in technical infrastructures, such as digital library resources |
|||
|
(Singh et al, 2021) (24) |
India |
Faculty members of Punjab Medical Institutions (209 teachers at the university) |
Limited internet access |
|
Lack of training in the use of digital platforms |
|||
|
Not ready for e-learning |
|||
|
Lack of sufficient devices/hardware |
|||
|
Increased workload |
|||
|
Lack of personal interaction with students |
|||
|
Poor responses from students |
|||
|
Difficulty in creating visual plans for courses |
|||
|
Fatigue and anxiety/personal fear of e-learning |
|||
|
Distraction while teaching |
|||
|
Solutions: Changing interactive methods and content in online lectures, Providing the necessary infrastructures such as a strong Internet connection, hardware, and devices required for classes |
|||
|
(Muller et al, 2021) (25) |
Singapore |
14 instructors from a major university in Singapore |
Decreased student participation |
|
Difficulty in meeting students' needs |
|||
|
Lack of proper learning |
|||
|
Increased workload of instructors |
|||
|
Solutions: Promoting different ways of participation, integrating tests and videos into pre-recorded lectures/live polls, Developing social relationships with others, Proper education and planning |
|||
|
(Padhi et al, 2021) (26) |
India |
24 faculty members from AIIMS, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India |
Lack of controlled environment |
|
Network problems during online classes |
|||
|
Lack of attention from students |
|||
|
Limitation of practical activities by students |
|
(Tsai et al , 2020) (27) |
Pennsylvania State |
576 faculty members from Pennsylvania State University |
Lack of learning resources |
|
Challenges related to technology |
|||
|
Not coincidence of distance courses with face-to-face ones |
|||
|
Lack of performance evaluation of classroom participation and communication |
|||
|
Challenges related to technology |
|||
|
Increased psychological load and other stresses |
|||
|
Solutions: Need for more organizational support, More support for students and teachers |
|||
|
(Smith et al, 2021) (28) |
Midwestern United States |
15 faculty members from a Midwestern state university |
Lack of proper technology |
|
Increased workload |
|||
|
Limited self-efficacy |
|||
|
Lack of resources |
|||
|
(Sedaghatjou et al, 2020) (29) |
Multiple countries |
101 Faculty Members of STEM International |
Training problems |
|
Evaluation problems |
|||
|
Problems related to technology |
|||
|
(Shidiq et al, 2020) (30) |
West Java Indonesia |
55 chemistry teachers |
Limited access to electronic devices and the |
|
Difficulty in performing laboratory activities |
|||
|
Challenges related to evaluation of students' learnings |
|||
|
Lack of proper understanding of the student's situations |
|||
|
Decreased interaction between teacher and student |
|||
|
(Ng et al, 2020) (31) |
Hong Kong |
Three instructors from primary, secondary, and higher education institutions |
Digital gap |
|
Technical concerns |
|||
|
Lack of student motivation |
|||
|
Privacy |
|||
|
Solutions: Borrowing digital devices, Increasing parental support, Use of combined education methods, Training technology literacy |
|||
|
(Alsobhi et al, 2021) (32) |
Saudi Arabia |
213 University teachers |
Problems with internet connection |
|
Slow internet speed during online lectures |
|||
|
Lack of access to computers, smartphones, and tablets |
|||
|
(Elberkawi et al, 2021) (33) |
Benghazi, Libya |
101 faculty members from 6 faculties of the University of Libya |
Time-consuming processes of file sharing |
|
Not easy to upload educational files |
|||
|
Difficulty of student evaluation methods |
|||
|
Problems with accessing the Internet |
|||
|
Problems with working with applications |
|||
|
Power outage |
|||
|
Lack of access to necessary facilities |
|||
|
Solutions: Providing a suitable infrastructure for the Internet, Providing appropriate tools, information, and education platforms for teachers |
|||
|
(Almazova et al, 2020) (34) |
Russia |
87 University teachers |
Low level of computer literacy |
|
Problems with electronic environments of universities and their support services |
|||
|
Lack of readiness of teachers to teach online |
|||
|
Lack of readiness of students to learn online |
|||
|
Inability to use the facilities of online and offline classes |
|||
|
Limited communication with students |
|||
|
Solutions: Dealing with psychological barriers while holding online educational activities, Development of hardware and software infrastructures, Organizational support and providing recommendations related to the implementation of educational activities in a digital educational environment, developing some applications for professional improvement of teachers, providing supervisory support from the university by focusing on determining the workload of teachers while working online |
|
(Elshami et al, 2021) (35) |
United Arabic Emirates |
70 Faculty members |
A great deal of workload |
|
Time-consuming processes of preparation and presentation of distance education materials |
|||
|
Technical issues |
|||
|
Solutions: Institutional support and appropriate organizational policy to increase teachers' satisfaction |
|||
|
Alzubaidi et al, 2021 (36) |
Multiple countries |
111 colleges of pharmacy from 28 countries, among which, 46 colleges were selected from 21 countries, which included 42 faculty members and 26 managers |
Lack of integration of evaluations |
|
Impossibility of holding practical and laboratory classes |
|||
|
Increased work-related stress |
|||
|
No use of appropriate technology and preparation |
|||
|
Problems with online lectures |
|||
|
Lack of interaction with the student |
Table 3 shows that the population of these studies is from the countries of United States (3 studies), India
(2 studies), and finally, the countries of Poland, Indonesia, China, Egypt, Singapore, United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Libya, and Russia have been one study each. Also, three studies were conducted in several different countries. The population of these articles included university professors and higher education teachers. The sample size also had been in the range of 3 to higher than 576 samples in articles. Zoom Meeting, Google Meeting, and social media applications such as Skype, WhatsApp, Telegram, Facebook, and YouTube are the most commonly used platforms for virtual education.
Table 3 presents university teachers' most important challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic. Accordingly, limitations related to Internet access and appropriate communication infrastructure (7 studies), lack of familiarity and necessary training of teachers and students in working with virtual education platforms (6 studies), lack of access to computer equipment and hardware (5 studies), the prevalence of physical and mental problems in teachers and
students, lack of proper interaction between students and teachers, increased workload of teachers, and impossibility of holding practical classes are an important challenge in virtual education during COVID-19.
Discussion
The results of the study indicated that the most critical challenges facing teachers during the
COVID-19 pandemic were as follows, in order of highest to lowest: 1) Limitations on Internet access and appropriate communication infrastructures, 2) lack of access to computer equipment and hardware, 3) low levels of familiarity and necessary training of teachers and students in working with virtual education systems, 4) prevalence of physical and psychological problems in teachers and students, 5) lack of proper interaction between students and teachers, 6) increase in the workload of teachers, and 7) impossibility of holding practical classes.
That one of the most important challenges that teachers faced during this crisis was related to internet access. According to the definition of virtual education, the internet and intranets are considered the main technology (37). In this regard, it has been stated that during the COVID-19 pandemic, many universities also lacked the necessary infrastructure and tools for virtual education (38). The limitations related to the infrastructures for virtual education, such as internet bandwidth limitations, have resulted in poor efficiency in audio, video, and animations and have wasted time (39). Other studies also stated challenges, including internet bandwidth and mobile data prices (40, 41).
The present study's findings also demonstrated that the limitation of students' and teachers' access to hardware and software systems had been another challenge in virtual education from the teachers' perspective during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Other studies also stated challenges like lack of access to computers or laptops (42, 38). This study's results are consistent with the present study's results. Some other research pieces have discussed that the lack of access to cyberspace and electronic equipment for all students, especially in remote areas, caused inequality in educational opportunities, and many students were disregarded (43, 44). Moreover, due to the home quarantine programs for other occupations, computers and IT equipment at home might be in demand by parents and other household members; therefore, home education could be difficult for students and teachers (45).
It was also concluded that the lack of technical knowledge and inability to work with virtual education systems had been another challenge for teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Since the outbreak of COVID-19 and the closure of classrooms occurred suddenly. Without prior planning, training teachers and students and making proper plans for selecting virtual education platforms was impossible. In this regard, previous studies have shown that a forced shift to virtual education has caused stress, uncertainty, and anxiety. It has been difficult for teachers to change mindsets, become accustomed to online tools, and learn new skills, such as speech recording (25). This study's results are consistent with the present study's results. Posey & Pintz (2017) stated that virtual education changed the roles and responsibilities of educators (46). For this purpose, and to design and deliver virtual education effectively, educators need to be aware of the features necessary to design and present this type of education. In this regard, they must first improve their technical skills to protect themselves against technological advances (47).
According to the results, another challenge was increased physical and mental problems during the virtual education. Alhosseini Abolmaali claimed that during the COVID-19 pandemic, students have suffered from many psychological problems. On the other hand, physical problems have occurred due to the inactivity of students and teachers, and they have become overweight, which has caused serious damage to their physical health (48). Numerous studies in this context have also indicated that virtual education during the COVID-19 pandemic has had different academic and educational consequences, including burnout (49, 50), anxiety, and stress (51). This study's results are consistent with the present study's results.
Lack of classroom interactions has been another challenge of virtual education during the COVID-19 crisis (41). Communication and interaction play important roles in teaching, learning, and achieving its purposes (52).
Furthermore, the present review indicated other challenges in virtual learning, such as problems related to parents and family, low quality and limited learning resources, lack of necessary instructions and regulations regarding virtual education, and privacy concerns. Examining the challenges of virtual education from the point of view of university professors was one of the limitations of the present research. Also, this study only examined studies published in English.
Conclusion
Virtual education has replaced face-to-face education during the COVID-19 pandemic; however, teachers have faced many challenges due to the existing circumstances and the rapid shift from face-to-face to virtual education. The results of the present study demonstrated that the lack of access to the appropriate equipment and limited access to the Internet had been the main challenges of virtual education from the teachers' perspective. Moreover, teachers' and students' lack of sufficient ability and experience was another important challenge that teachers faced during the COVID-19 pandemic. Accordingly, educational officials and administrators should consider the ability of students and teachers to access equipment, and to increase equality and educational justice, physical and financial facilities should be supplied to provide appropriate equipment and infrastructure for people who cannot access these platforms and infrastructures. Moreover, it is suggested that to improve the quality of virtual education and learning, the necessary training be provided to increase the skills of educators in using virtual learning platforms.