The Impact of Game-Based Learning on Electrocardiogram Interpretation Skills of Medical Students Compared to Conventional Learning Methods: A Comparative Pilot Study

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Cardiovascular Technology, College of Allied Health Science, DR MGR Educational and Research Institute, ACS Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu

2 Department of Allied health sciences, DR MGR Educational and Research Institute, ACS Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu

3 Intern, College of Allied Health Science, DR MGR Educational and Research Institute, ACS Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu

10.22062/sdme.2025.200620.1483
Abstract
Background: In the contemporary landscape of technology, the integration of gamification in education has gained significant traction. Past research has indicated that gamified learning fosters motivation and engagement among 21st-century students in academic pursuits. Although well-documented in general education, there remains a dearth of empirical studies evaluating the efficacy of gamified learning in medicine. This discrepancy is apparent in the disparate guidance about incorporating gamification in medical education.
Objectives: This research aimed to assess the effectiveness of game-based ECG learning (G-ECG) in undergraduate medical students.
Methods: The current study utilized a quasi-experimental design involving the recruitment of 120 second-year medical students during the 2023-2024 academic year at the Faculty of Allied Health Sciences (AHS) within a Private Medical College and Hospital in Chennai, Tamil Nadu. The G-ECG group engaged in educational activities utilizing the Six-Second ECG (SS-ECG) web-based game offered by SKILLSTAT. The G-ECG group used a one-hour gamified application to attain proficiency in identifying 27 ECG rhythms. Conversely, the Conventional (C-ECG) group participated in a one-hour training session led by certified ECG professionals to develop competency in recognizing 27 ECG rhythms. The performance of both groups was evaluated through an online assessment, and statistical analysis was utilized to compare scores and response times for each question. The data were analyzed using the Chi-square and independent t-test within the SPSS software environment.
Results: In a study of 120 second-year students, 34.1% were male, and 65.8% were female. The mean age was 19.23 ± 0.50 years for the conventional learning group and 19.15 ± 0.60 years for the game-based learning group, with no significant differences in demographics (P>0.05). Both groups had 60 participants each. The participants utilized the game-based ECG learning method and achieved a knowledge attainment level of 61.7%, with a p-value of <0.001. In contrast, those involved in the conventional ECG learning method attained only 33.3%.
Conclusion: The study found that game-based ECG learning proves more effective than conventional methods in improving diagnostic accuracy. However, when it comes to enhancing interpretation skills, gamified learning proves equally effective as conventional ECG learning.

Highlights

Thirumurugan Ettiyappan: (Google Scholar) (PubMed)

Kalpana Devi Venkatesan: (Google Scholar) (PubMed)

Shainfathima Aslam Khan: (Google Scholar) (PubMed)

Kishore Kumar Vinayagar: (Google Scholar) (PubMed)

Gomathi Gopi: (Google Scholar) (PubMed)

Mageshwari Purushothaman: (Google Scholar) (PubMed)

Sonia Irungbam: (Google Scholar) (PubMed)

Pennarasi Shivani Kodishwaran: (Google Scholar) (PubMed)

 

Keywords


1. Ruiz-Bañuls M, Gómez-Trigueros IM, Rovira-Collado J, Rico-Gómez ML. Gamification and transmedia in interdisciplinary contexts: A didactic intervention for the primary school classroom. Heliyon. 2021;7(6):e07374. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07374. PMID: 34235287 PMCID: PMC8246385
2. Hartt M, Hosseini H, Mostafapour M. Game On: Exploring the Effectiveness of Game-based Learning. Planning Practice & Research. 2020 35(5); 589–604. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2020.1778859.
3.  Thirumurugan E, Dias E, Karthick R. Factors Influencing Electrocardiogram Pattern in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review for Future Research. Journal of Cardiac Critical Care. 2024;8(2):85-94. doi: 10.25259/JCCC_74_2023.
4. Elsheikh E, Alkhteeb N, Alamer A, Alarfaj MO, AlQarni G, Alsultan J. Medical Students' Competency and Confidence in Interpreting Electrocardiograms at King Faisal University. Cureus. 2023;15(10):e46393. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46393. PMID: 37927746 PMCID: PMC10620545
5.  Ardekani A, Hider AM, Rastegar Kazerooni AA, Hosseini SA, Roshanshad A, Amini M, et al. Surfing the clinical trials of ECG teaching to medical students: A systematic review. J Educ Health Promot. 2023; 12:107. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_780_22. PMID: 37288415 PMCID: PMC10243439
6.  Wang YF, Hsu YF, Fang KT, Kuo LT. Gamification in medical education: identifying and prioritizing key elements through Delphi method. Med Educ Online. 2024;29(1):2302231. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2024.2302231. PMID: 38194415 PMCID: PMC10778414
7.  van Gaalen AEJ, Brouwer J, Schönrock-Adema J, Bouwkamp-Timmer T, Jaarsma ADC, Georgiadis JR. Gamification of health professions education: a systematic review. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2021;26(2):683-711. doi: 10.1007/s10459-020-10000-3. PMID: 33128662 PMCID: PMC8041684
8.  McCoy L, Lewis JH, Dalton D. Gamification and Multimedia for Medical Education: A Landscape Review. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2016;116(1):22-34. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2016.003. PMID: 26745561
9.  SkillSTAT Learning. SS-ECG (The six second ECG). North Vancouver, Canada: British Columbia; 2020.
10. Ohn MH, Yusof S, Lansing MG, Ravindran B, Nisar K, Mchucha I, et al. Gamified Online Active Learning Theory. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Engineering (AIKE); 2018 Sep 12-13; Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia. 2018: 274-7. doi: 10.1109/IICAIET.2018.8638463.
11. Salerno SM, Alguire PC, Waxman HS. Competency in interpretation of 12-lead electrocardiograms: a summary and appraisal of published evidence. Ann Intern Med. 2003; 138(9):751-60. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-138-9-200305060-00013. PMID: 12729431
12. Pudło J, Wierdak M, Macioł K, Gumul K and Lelakowski J. The comparison of 4th, 5th and 6th year medical students knowledge of rules and practical skills in the interpretation of electrocardiograms at Jagiellonian University. Przegl Lek. 2012;69(4):143-8. PMID: 23029708
13. Lima CJM de, Coelho RA, Medeiros MS, Kubrusly M, Marçal E, Peixoto Júnior AA. Development and Validation of a Mobile Application for Teaching Electrocardiography. Rev Bras Educ Med. 2019; 43 (1 suppl 1):157-65. doi: 10.1590/1981-5271v43suplemento1-20190164.
14. Fent G, Gosai J, Purva M. A randomized control trial comparing use of a novel electrocardiogram simulator with traditional teaching in the acquisition of electrocardiogram interpretation skill. J Electrocardiol. 2016 Mar-Apr;49(2):112-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2015.11.005. PMID: 26709105
15. Fent G, Gosai J, Purva M. Teaching the interpretation of electrocardiograms: which method is best? J Electrocardiol. 2015;48(2):190-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2014.12.014. PMID: 25573481
16. Kopeć G, Waligóra M, Pacia M, Chmielak W, Stȩpień A, Janiec S, et al. 2018 Electrocardiogram reading: A randomized study comparing 2 e-learning methods for medical students. Pol Arch Intern Med. 2018; 128(2):98-104. doi: 10.20452/pamw.4146. PMID: 29112943
17.  Nilsson M, Bolinder G, Held C, Johansson BL, Fors U, Östergren J. Evaluation of a web-based ECG-interpretation programme for undergraduate medical students. BMC Med Educ. 2008;8:25. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-8-25. PMID: 18430256 PMCID: PMC2394519
18. Montassier E, Hardouin JB, Segard J, Batard E, Potel G, Planchon B, et al. e-Learning versus lecture-based courses in ECG interpretation for undergraduate medical students. Eur J Emerg Med. 2016; 23(2): 108-13. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000215. PMID: 25386694