E-Learning in Medical Education: Unveiling Students’ Perspectives and Key Interactive Predictors of Success at an Iranian University

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Health and Medical Service Management, Faculty of Health, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran

2 Department of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine School, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran

10.22062/sdme.2026.201731.1653
Abstract
Background: The pedagogical potential of interactive e-learning is significant, yet numerous challenges remain.
Objectives: This study explored students’ experiences of e-learning challenges at Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences (HUMS) while also identifying independent predictors of these challenges.
Methods: A descriptive-analytical study was undertaken online in 2023. A total of 162 HUMS students completed a questionnaire comprising demographic information, interactive techniques, and common e-learning challenges. The instrument’s validity was established through expert review (CVI=0.92, CVR=0.89) and exploratory factor analysis, whereas reliability was confirmed using Cronbach’s alpha (α=0.88). Voluntary sampling was employed, with participants invited from all faculties to lower the selection bias. Informed consent was obtained electronically. Data were coded and analyzed in SPSS-22 using descriptive statistics and logistic regression to determine independent predictors.
Results: Major e-learning challenges (Mean >3.0 on a 5-point scale) included difficulties with the home learning environment, completing assignments, managing large volumes of content, engaging in practical courses, and adapting to online platforms. Logistic regression indicated that active participation in virtual small groups and peer discussions in virtual forums significantly predicted greater educational exposure, with adjusted odds ratios of 1.68 (95% CI: 1.32–2.13, P = 0.001) and 1.05 (95% CI: 1.03–1.07, P = 0.024), respectively.
Conclusion: Findings suggest that incorporating virtual small groups and forums can enhance students’ learning experiences by ameliorating engagement and exposure to diverse perspectives. In spite of the study’s limitation of relying on self-reported data from a single institution, the results highlight practical strategies for optimizing
e-learning, especially in resource-constrained settings. Future research should involve multi-center cohorts in order to validate these outcomes.

Keywords


1.  Altawaty JA, Benismail A, Maatuk AM. Experts opinion on the IT skills training needs among healthcare workers.. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Engineering & MIS; 2020 Sep 14-16; Almaty, Kazakhstan. 2020: 1-8. doi: 10.1145/3410352.3410790.
2.  Jin YQ, Lin C-L, Zhao Q, Yu S-W, Su Y-S. A study on traditional teaching method transferring to E-learning under the COVID-19 pandemic: From Chinese students' perspectives. Front Psychol. 2021; 12: 632787. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.632787. PMID: 33776854 PMCID: PMC7991594
3. Haleem A, Javaid M, Qadri MA, Suman R. Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers. 2022;3:275-85. doi: 10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004.
4.  McCutcheon K, O’Halloran P, Lohan M. Online learning versus blended learning of clinical supervisee skills with pre-registration nursing students: A randomised controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018; 82:30-39. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.02.005. PMID: 29574394
5.   Kumar P, Saxena C, Baber H. Learner-content interaction in
e-learning-the moderating role of perceived harm of COVID-19 in assessing the satisfaction of learners. Smart Learn Environ. 2021;8(1):5. doi:
10.1186/s40561-021-00149-8. PMID: 40477398 PMCID: PMC8050475
6.  Morrison GR, Ross SM, Kemp JE, Kalman H. Designing Effective Instruction. 8ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2011.
7. Balaji M, Chakrabarti D. Student interactions in online discussion forum: Empirical research from'media richness theory'perspective. Journal of Interactive Online Learning. 2010;9(1): 1.
8. Talebian S, Mohammadi HM, Rezvanfar A. Information and communication technology (ICT) in higher education: advantages, disadvantages, conveniences and limitations of applying e-learning to agricultural students in Iran. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014; 152: 300-5. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.199.
9.  Zimmerman TD. Exploring learner to content interaction as a success factor in online courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2012;13(4):152-65. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v13i4.1302.
10. Almahasees Z, Mohsen K, Amin MO. Faculty’s and students’ perceptions of online learning during COVID-19. Frontiers in Education. 2021; 6: 638470. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2021.638470.
11. Songkram N, Khlaisang J, Puthaseranee B, Likhitdamrongkiat M. E-learning system to enhance cognitive skills for learners in higher education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015;174:667-73. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.599.
12. Al Rawashdeh AZ, Mohammed EY, Al Arab AR, Alara M,
Al-Rawashdeh B. Advantages and disadvantages of using
e-learning in university education: Analyzing students’ perspectives. Electronic Journal of E-learning. 2021;19(3): 107-17. doi:
10.34190/ejel.19.3.2168.
13. Demuyakor J. Coronavirus (COVID-19) and online learning in higher institutions of education: A survey of the perceptions of Ghanaian international students in China. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies. 2020;10(3):e202018. doi: 10.29333/ojcmt/8286.
14. Ferri F, Grifoni P, Guzzo T. Online learning and emergency remote teaching: Opportunities and challenges in emergency situations. Societies. 2020;10(4):86. doi:10.3390/soc10040086.
15. O'Byrne L, Gavin B, Adamis D, Lim YX, McNicholas F. Levels of stress in medical students due to COVID-19. J Med Ethics. 2021; 47: 383-8. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-107155. PMID: 33658333
16. Sweetman DS. Making virtual learning engaging and interactive. FASEB Bioadv. 2020; 3(1): 11-19. doi: 10.1096/fba.2020-00084. PMID: 33490881 PMCID: PMC7805543
17. Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology. 1975;28(4): 563. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x.
18. Williams B, Onsman A, Brown T. Exploratory factor analysis:
A five-step guide for novices. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine. 2010;8:1-13. doi:
10.33151/ajp.8.4.84.
19. Dyrek N, Wikarek A, Niemiec M, Owczarek AJ, Olszanecka-Glinianowicz M, Kocełak P. The perception of e-learning during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic by students of medical universities in Poland–a survey-based study. BMC Med Educ. 2022; 22(1):529. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03600-7. PMID: 35804369 PMCID: PMC9263431
20. Azlan CA, Wong JHD, Tan LK, Huri MSNA, Ung NM, Pallath V, et al. Teaching and learning of postgraduate medical physics using Internet-based e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic–A case study from Malaysia. Phys Med. 2020 Dec:80:10-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.10.002. PMID: 33070007 PMCID: PMC7539931
21. Abbasi MS, Ahmed N, Sajjad B, Alshahrani A, Saeed S, Sarfaraz S, et al. E-Learning perception and satisfaction among health sciences students amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Work. 2020;67(3):549-556. doi: 10.3233/WOR-203308. PMID: 33185620
22. Dost S, Hossain A, Shehab M, Abdelwahed A, Al-Nusair L. Perceptions of medical students towards online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national cross-sectional survey of 2721 UK medical students. BMJ Open. 2020; 10(11):e042378. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042378. PMID: 33154063 PMCID: PMC7646323
23. Przymuszała P, Zielińska-Tomczak Ł, Kłos M, Kowalska A, Birula P, Piszczek M, et al. Distance learning and assessment during the COVID-19 pandemic—perspectives of polish medical and healthcare students. Sage Open. 2022; 12(1): 21582440221085016. doi: 10.1177/21582440221085016.
24.   Spencer J. Making Learning Flow: Instruction and Assessment Strategies that Empower Students to Love Learning and Reach New Levels of Achievement. Bloomington, Indiana, US: Solution Tree Press; 2016.
25.   Kang X, Zhang W. An experimental case study on forum-based online teaching to improve student’s engagement and motivation in higher education. Interactive Learning Environments. 2023; 31(2): 1029-40. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2020.1817758.
26. Bisht RK, Jasola S, Bisht IP. Acceptability and challenges of online higher education in the era of COVID-19: a study of students' perspective. Asian Education and Development Studies. 2020;11(2):401-14. doi: 10.1108/AEDS-05-2020-0119.
27. Agung ASN, Surtikanti MW, Quinones CA. Students’ perception of online learning during COVID-19 pandemic: A case study on the English students of STKIP Pamane Talino. SOSHUM: Jurnal Sosial Dan Humaniora. 2020;10(2):225-35.
28. Adnan M, Anwar K. Online learning amid the COVID-19 pandemic: Students' perspectives. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology. 2020;1(2):45-51. doi: 10.33902/JPSP.2020261309.
29. Mayer RE. The future of multimedia learning. The Journal of Applied Instructional Design. 2022;11(4):69-77. doi: 10.59668/423.10349.
30. Bączek M, Zagańczyk-Bączek M, Szpringer M, Jaroszyński A, Wożakowska-Kapłon B. Students’ perception of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: A survey study of Polish medical students. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021; 100(7):e24821. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024821. PMID: 33607848 PMCID: PMC7899848
31. Kay D, Pasarica M. Using technology to increase student
(and faculty satisfaction with) engagement in medical education. Adv Physiol Educ. 2019; 43(3):408-413. doi:
10.1152/advan.00033.2019. PMID: 31408381
32. Cao W, Fang Z, Hou G, Han M, Xu X, Dong J, et al. The psychological impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on college students in China. Psychiatry Res. 2020 May:287:112934. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112934. PMID: 32229390 PMCID: PMC7102633
33.  Sangster A, Stoner G, Flood B. Insights into accounting education in a COVID-19 world. Accounting Education. 2020; 29(5): 431-562. doi: 10.1080/09639284.2020.1808487.
34.  Zarei S, Mohammadi S. Challenges of higher education related to e-learning in developing countries during COVID-19 spread: a review of the perspectives of students, instructors, policymakers, and ICT experts. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022; 29(57): 85562-8. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14647-2. PMID: 34100207 PMCID: PMC8184049