Manzumeh Shamsi Meimandi; Maryam Okhovati; Elham Sharifpoor; Amir Abbas Shafeezadeh; Shahriar Dabiri
Abstract
Background: Given that basic medical science lessons constitute the fundamental part of the professional doctorate course, and among the numerous factors influencing education quality, the teacher is considered one of the most crucial facets of education quality.Objectives: The present research was conducted ...
Read More
Background: Given that basic medical science lessons constitute the fundamental part of the professional doctorate course, and among the numerous factors influencing education quality, the teacher is considered one of the most crucial facets of education quality.Objectives: The present research was conducted to determine the perspectives of medical graduates regarding teaching basic science lessons by professors with MSc-PhD degrees compared to professors with MD-PhD degrees.Methods: This descriptive-analytical and cross-sectional study was carried out on 200 general practitioners working on their plans in Kerman. Data were collected through a researcher-made questionnaire and finally analyzed using the paired t-test and its non-parametric equivalent (Wilcoxon test) by SPSS 22 software.Results: The mean score of graduates concerning teaching basic sciences by professors with MD-PhD degrees was significantly higher than that of professors with MSc-PhD degrees (P = 0.01); this score significantly increased with enhancing their work experience. In all basic science lessons, medical graduates mostly agreed to teach lessons by professors with MD-PhD degrees than professors with MSc-PhD degrees; however, the frequency of proponents of this issue was mostly different in histology (100%), physiology, anatomy, bacteriology (81%), and public health (99%) lessons, and the lowest disagreement was associated with biochemistry (53.5%) and parasitology (60%) lessons.Conclusion: To reinforce and promote the education and learning level of medical students in the country and the health system, professors teaching basic sciences should have the required information and education regarding clinical applications of education, such as professors with MD-PhD degrees, and pay more attention to the clinical aspects in their teaching. It is suggested to hold postdoctoral programs or in-service training, workshops, etc. to achieve this goal.
Elham Jafari; Shariar Dabiri; Foroogh Mangeli; Reza Baneshi
Abstract
Background According to the importance of the clinical pathology for diagnosis, decision making regarding preventive and minimally invasive methods, and treatment follow-ups, it is useful to familiarize medical students with better utilization of laboratory tests before clinical practice and incorporate ...
Read More
Background According to the importance of the clinical pathology for diagnosis, decision making regarding preventive and minimally invasive methods, and treatment follow-ups, it is useful to familiarize medical students with better utilization of laboratory tests before clinical practice and incorporate them into the curriculum. Objectives The current study aimed at investigating the quality of education and satisfaction with clinical pathology course among medical students at physiopathology level initiated since 2014 at Kerman University of Medical Sciences for further systematization of the curriculum, and its efficacy in increasing students’ knowledge. Methods In the current interventional study, medical students at physiopathology level were enrolled and, after making necessary coordination with the Deputy of Education, a one-unit clinical pathology course was added to routine (five-unit) physiopathology course for the students attending the second semester of 2013 - 2014 academic year. Two groups of students attending internship program including 42 subjects that took the clinical pathology course and 42 other ones that did not take the course were consecutively enrolled. A questionnaire was distributed among the subjects in the two groups and the obtained data were analyzed with SPSS version 19.0 using chi-square test. Results Overall, the medical students in both groups believed that clinical pathology course was essential for both theoretical and practical education. Most of the students in the two groups perceived that the inclusion of clinical pathology course in physiopathology course was good. Both groups perceived the course as useful for better management of patients in postgraduate studies. Conclusions There is no theoretical and applied academic course with rational systematic training objectives in the clinical pathology field for better utilization of laboratory tests. It highlights the need for paying further attention and planning in this field.
