Explaining the pros and cons of different sources of Faculty Evaluation from the viewpoints of Medical University Academics

Arabi Mianroodi, Ali Asghar; Asgari Baravati, Zahra; Khanjani, Nages

Explaining the pros and cons of different sources of Faculty Evaluation from the viewpoints of Medical University Academics

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Ali Asghar Arabi Mianroodi ¹

Zahra Asgari Baravati ²

Nages Khanjani ³

¹ Specialist in Otorhinolaryngology, Assistant Professor of Otorhinolaryngology Dept., School of Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

² B.Sc. in Health Services Department, School of Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

³ Ph.D. in Epidemiology, Assistant Professor of Epidemiology and Statistics Dept., School of Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Iran

Abstract

Background & Objectives: Nowadays improvement of teaching quality is one of the basics for a credible higher education system and without doubt evaluation and monitoring of teaching quality are important for reaching this goal However different studies have shown that academic evaluation is one of the most controversial topics in Medical Education and deserves more research and attention Meanwhile the experience of academics as the subjects of these assessments can be very helpful Methods: The current study is a qualitative (phenomenology) study Interested academics were invited to participate in 4 focus groups each including 6 to 8 participants Open unstructured questions were asked Participants suggested different methods of academic assessment and commented on the pros and cons of each The focus group discussions ended when the conductors felt data saturation has been met Results : Data were analyzed through theme analysis method A total of nine different data sources including seven subjective sources (asking from students head of faculty head of department and colleagues as well as selfassessment twoway assessment and assessment by a third party) and two objective ones (students scoring and the academics output) were mentioned and their pros and cons were explored thoroughly and the methods for increasing data quality from each source were also proposed Conclusion: In order to acquire more fair results academic assessment should rather be done through an appropriate combination of different information sources and by considering the current situation and the shortcomings of each source

Keywords

Faculty Evaluation

qualitative research

Pros

Cons

Saif AA. The methods of assessing and evaluating education. Third ed.: Doran Publications; 1378. [In Persian]
Cahn S. Faculty members should be evaluated by their peers, not by their students. Chron High Educ. 1987; October 14, B2.
Sanagoo A, Jooybari L. Students’ Viewpoints and Experiences about Evaluation of Academic staff in Theoretical courses. Strides in Development of Medical Education. 2010;7(1):57-69. [In Persian]
Adhami A. Academic assessment by students. Baztab. 2005;2(3):4. [In Persian]
Kaykhaei A, Navidian A, Tabasi MA, Sargazi Gh.H. Study of ZUMS faculty members' views on faculty members' assessment. Zahedan Journal of Research in Medical Sciences (Tabib Shargh). 2002;4(3):135-40. [In Persian]
Shams B, editor. Academic assessment workshop. The first National Conference of Medical Education; 1374; Shahid Beheshti Medical School, Tehran, Iran.
Ziaee M, Miri M, Haji-Abadi M, Azarkar Gh, Eshbak P. Academic staff and students' impressions on academic evaluation of students in Birjand University of Medical Sciences and Health Services. Birjand University of Medical Sciences. 2007;13(4):61-7. [In Persian]
Amini M, Honardar M. The view of faculties and medical students about evaluation of faculty teaching experiences. Koomesh. 2008;9(3):171-8. [In Persian]
Oskouie SF, Peyrovi H. Qualitative Research in Nursing. Tehran, Iran: Iran University of Medical Sciences Publications; 2006. [In Persian]
Hansen EC. Successful Qualitative Health Research: A practical introduction. Scientific Commons. 2006.
Streubert Speziale HJ, Carpenter DR. Qualitative Research in Nursing. 4th edition ed. Philadelphia, USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.
Khoshrang H, et al. Academic assessment by students from the viewpoint of managers, academics and communicators. The 8th National Congress on Medical Education;; Kerman, Iran. 2007. [In Persian]
Yousefi Mashoof R, Emdadi S, Bayg Moradi A. Evaluating the attitude and viewpoints of students and academics of Hamadan Medical University about the academic student administered evaluation forms in 2005. Tahavvol va tosee amoozesh pezeshki. 2010;1(1):24. [In Persian]
Fink LD. Evaluating your own teaching. 1999. Available:From: URl: http://web.usca.edu/ dotAsset/66578.pdf.
Tarhani F. Evaluation of faculty members from viewpoint of medical students of Lorestan University of Medical Sciences. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2002;2:55-6. [In Persian]
Heine RP, Nick ME. Students perceptions of the faculty course evaluation process: an exploratory study. Stetson University. 2006. Availablefrom:http://www.stetson.edu/busines s/ fdc/papers.php.
Parchami R, Hoseini M. Attitude of students of Qazvin Medical University towards priorities in teachers assessment. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2003;2(3):40. [In Persian]
Ziaei M, Miri M, Haji Abadi M, Azarkar S, Ashbak P. The viewpoints of the students and academics of Birjand Medical University about academic performance assessment by students. Birjand University of Medical Sciences. 2007;13(4):61-7. [In Persian]
Ghafourian Borrojerdnia M, Shokoornia A, Elhampour H. Evaluation Results Feed back to Faculty Members of Ahvaz Medical University and its Effect on Improving the Quality of Teaching . Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2004;3(10):40-3. [In Persian]