Strides in Development of Medical Education

Document Type : Original Article


1 BSc in Health Care Management, Research Center for Health Services Management, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

2 Professor of Epidemiology, Physiology Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

3 MSc in Medical Education, Research Center for Health Services Management, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

4 Neonatologist, Department of Pediatrics, Medical School, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

5 MSc in Medical Library and Information Sciences, Research Center for Modeling in Health, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran


Background & Objective: Several factors play an integral role in the quality of higher education and improving its processes Professional role modeling is one of the most determining factors in achieving educational goals and fostering better learning Hence the aim of this study was to investigate the scientific characteristics of positive and negative role models among medical educators from the viewpoint of the dentistry and pharmacy students in Kerman University of Medical Sciences (Kerman Iran) Methods: In this descriptive analytical crosssectional study a structured and selfadministered questionnaire was completed by 94 senior pharmacy and dentistry students The questionnaire contained prespecified items in 3 sections relating to the demographic characteristics of respondents and scientific characteristics of positive and negative role models Results: The highest mean scores for positive role models were given to features as being respectful to colleagues (875) being knowledgeable (852) having teaching competencies (849) being good tempered (845) and being kind (843) There was not a statistically significant difference between the positive role models [age gender education level (basicclinical)] and the scientific rank The highest mean scores for negative role models were given to the features as deserving blame (697) having no teaching competencies (641) not being kind (609) not being a good manager (608) and not being respectful to students (603) There was only a significant difference between the negative role models and scientific rank (P = 0029) Totally 2 positive and 3 negative characteristics were identified for professional and nonprofessional role models These characteristics can be classified into ethical behavior and communication educational and managerial skills and scientific competencies There was not a statistically significant difference regarding the association between the scientific characteristics of positive and negative role models and the general characteristics of the respondents in terms of age variable Conclusion: Our results suggested that the positive and negative characteristics of teachers formed a significant part in their acceptance and choosing them as role models from the perspectives of students To achieve the educational goals and improving our higher education system special attention should be given to these aspects as personality professionalism and scientific characteristics


  1. Tang FL, Chou SM, Chiang HH. Students´ perceptions of effective and ineffective nursing instructors. The Journal of nursing education 2005; 44(4):187-92.
  2. Kilminster S, Cottrell D, Grant J, Jolly B. AMEE Guide No. 27: Effective educational and clinical supervision. Medical teacher 2007; 29(1):2-19.
  3. Brownell AKW, Cote L. Senior residents' views on the meaning of professionalism and how they learn about it. Academic Medicine 2001; 76(7):734-7.
  4. Prideaux D, Alexander H, Bower A, et al. Clinical teaching: maintaining an educational role for doctors in the new health care environment. Medical 34(10):820-6. education 2001;
  5. Ullian JA, Bland CJ, Simpson DE. An alternative approach to defining the role of the clinical teacher. Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 1994; 69(10):832.
  6. Crosby RMHJ. AMEE Guide No 20: The good teacher is more than a lecturer-the twelve roles of the teacher. Medical Teacher 2000; 22(4):334-47.
  7. Vahabi A, Nadrian H, Sayyadi M, et al. A quantitative study of determinant factors of effective teaching in Kurdistan University of medical sciences. Iranian Journal of Medical Education 2012; 12(1):46-54. [In Persian]
  8. Mohaddesi H, Feizi A, Safireza S. A comparison of teachers and students opinions toward effective teaching standards in Urmia University of medical sciences. Journal of Urmia Nursing and Midwifery Faculty 2011; 9(6):464-71. [In Persian]
  9. Mostafavi A, Ramezanloo P, Asgari N. Pharmacy students' reasons for choosing pharmacy as a career and changes in their motivation during the course. Journal of medical education development 2012; 5(9): 33-41. [In Persian]
  10. Amini M, Najafipour S, Torkan N, Ebrahiminejad F. Correlation between educational performance and communication skills of Jahrom medical teachers. Journal of Babol University of Medical Sciences 2010; 12(1):100-5. [In Persian]
  11. Wright SM, Carrese JA. Excellence in role modelling: insight and perspectives from the pros. Canadian Medical Association Journal 2002; 167(6):638-43.
  12. Bahreini M, Momeni Danaei Sh, Shahamat Sh, et al. The Quality of Educational Services: Gap between Optimal and Actual Status according to Dentistry Students. Iranian journal of medical education 2011; 11(7):685-95. [In Persian]
  13. Hammer D. Improving students' professionalism during experiential learning. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 2006; 70(3): 59 .
  14. Shabani B, Hosseingholizadeh R. A survey about the quality of teaching at Universities. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education 2006; 12(1): 1-22. [In Persian]
  15. Hajbagheri M, Dianati M. Personality proportion of nursing students for continuing education and work. Iranian Journal of Medical Education 2004; 4(2):5-11. [In Persian]
  16. Morrison EH, Hitchcock MA, Harthill M, et al. The on-line clinical teaching perception inventory: A snapshot of medical teachers. Family Medicine 2005; 37(1):48-53.
  17. Buchel TL, Edwards FD. Characteristics of effective clinical teachers. Family Medicine 2005; 37(1):30-5.
  18. Sutkin G, Wagner E, Harris I, Schiffer R. What makes a good clinical teacher in medicine? A review of the literature. Academic Medicine 2008; 83(5):452-66.
  19. Haghdoost AA, Shakibi MR. Medical student and academic staff perceptions of role models: an analytical cross-sectional study. BMC medical education 2006; 6(1):9.
  20. Shakornia A, Motlagh M, Malayeri A, et al. Students viewpoints on effective factors about teachers evaluation. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2005; 5(2):101-10. [In Persian]
  21. Rad M, Khalili H, Rakhshani M. Effective clinical teacher from Nursing and Midwifery students viewpoints. Quarterly Journal of Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences 2010; 17(4):287-93. [In Persian]
  22. Wessels IF. What in the senior student's view makes a good and what makes a bad teacher at a medical faculty? South African medical Journal 1973; 47(43):2083-6.
  23. Cote L, Leclere H. How clinical teachers perceive the doctor-patient relationship and themselves as role models. Academic Medicine 2000; 75(11):1117-24.
  24. Wright SM, Carrese JA. Serving as a physician role model for a diverse population of medical learners. Academic Medicine 2003; 78(6):6238.
  25. Ambrozy DM, Irby DM, Bowen JL, et al. Role models' perceptions of themselves and their influence on students' specialty choices. Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges. 1997; 72(12):1119-21.