Document Type : Brief report
Ph.D. Student in Nursing, Razi School of Nursing and Midwifery, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
M.Sc. in Nursing, Instructor, Department of Nursing, Islamic Azad University, Estahban Branch, Estahban, Iran
Ph.D. in Nursing, Assistant Professor, Medical Education Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
Ph.D. in Nursing, Assistant Professor, Department of Internal-Surgical Nursing AND Physiology Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
Background & Objective: In order to improve the quality of higher education programs and make them dynamic quantitative and qualitative evaluations and assessments are required In this study the context input process and product (CIPP) evaluation model was used to evaluate the School of Medicine at Kerman University of Medical Sciences Iran in 2014 Methods: The evaluation of this school based on the CIPP model consisted of the 4 components of context input process and output The sample included 69 students 20 professors and 12 postgraduates A researcher made questionnaire was used to collect data The scores of 015 1535 and 355 were considered as representing poor conditions relatively favorable conditions and favorable conditions respectively Data were analyzed using SPSS software and descriptive and inferential statistics (ttest) Results: From the perspective of the participants of the research the status of context input process and output and in general the School of Medicine was favorable and the output of the school was relatively favorable There was a significant difference between the students and professors point of views in terms of the context process and outcome of the school (P < 005) The students ranked the context as favorable while the professors ranked input process and output of the school as favorable Conclusion: The results of the final evaluation revealed that the condition of this school is favorable To achieve a highly favorable condition it is suggested that college and university authorities attempt to strengthen important factors such as revision of curriculum content and training professors on teaching methods evaluation and communication skills
- Harris LM, Adamson BJ, Hunt AE. Assessing quality in higher education: criteria for evaluating programmes for allied health professionals. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 1998; 23(3): 273-81.
- Alwani SM, Danaee-fard H. Organization theory. (Translation). Robbins S. Tehran: Saffar Pub; 2010. [In Persian]
- Saif AA. Educational measurement, assessment and evaluation. Tehran: Doran; 2006. [In Persian]
- Robinson B. The CIPP approach to evaluation. COLLIT Project. 2002, The CIPP approach to evaluation, COLLIT Project. [Cited 2002 May 4]. Available from: http://www.fivehokies.com/Evaluation/Evaluation Approaches/Management Oriented/CIPP Approach to Evalaution.pdf
- Alimohammadi T, Rezaeian M, Bakhshi H, Vaziri Nejad R. The Evaluation of the Medical School Faculty of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences Based on the CIPP Model in 2010. J Rafsanjan Univ Med Sci. 2013; 12(3): 205-18. [In Persian]
- Tezakori Z, Mazaheri E, Namnebat M, Torabizadeh K, Fathi S, Ebrahimibil F. The evaluation of PhD nursing in Iran (Using the CIPP Evaluation Model). J Health Care. 2010; 12(2): 43-51. [In Persian]
- Stufflebeam DL. The Cipp Model For Evaluation. Kluwer International Handbooks of Education. 2003; 9: 31-62.
- Ghafourian Boroujerdnia M, Shakurnia AH, Elhampour H. The opinions of academic members of Ahvaz University of Medical Sciences about the effective factors on their evaluation score variations. J Strides Dev Med Educ. 2006; 3(1): 19-25. [In Persian]
- Motallehnejan M, Haji Ahmadi M, Mortazavi Moghaddam V. A study on educational status of dental students at clinical courses in Babol University of Medical Sciences during 1998-2002. J Babol Univ Med Sci. 2010; 12(Suppl 1): 46-51. [In Persian]
- Saberian M. Group's internal evaluation of medical surgical nursing department of Semnan University of Medical Sciences. Proceedings of the International Conference AMEE; 2004 Sep 5-8; Edinburgh, Scotland, UK. 2004: 22-3.
- Khadem N, Khodadadi N, Ebrahimzadeh S. Openion poll of graduates from MashhadSchool of Medicine, regarding coordination of learnings, during their study with the objectives of education in giving medical services to society. Med J Mashad Univ Med Sci. 2009; 4(51): 233-8. [In Persian]
- Bazrafkan L, Nikseresht AR, Bazargany A. Need assessment of medical education’s general objectives in basic sciences & physiopathology periods according to intern’s views. Iran J Med Educ. 2002, 2(0): 18. [In Persian]
- Anderson CA. Current strengths and limitations of doctoral education in nursing: are we prepared for the future? J Prof Nurs. 2000; 16(4):191-200.