Fatemeh Farshad; Masoomeh Kheirkhah; Jorma Virtanen; Hossein Hessari
Abstract
Background: Learning is due to behavioral changes in knowledge, skills, and attitude.Objectives: The current research assesses the state of the atmosphere, educational environment, and self-efficacy domains. It also assesses how the educational environment affects dental students' sense of self-efficacy.Methods: ...
Read More
Background: Learning is due to behavioral changes in knowledge, skills, and attitude.Objectives: The current research assesses the state of the atmosphere, educational environment, and self-efficacy domains. It also assesses how the educational environment affects dental students' sense of self-efficacy.Methods: All clinical undergraduate dental students (N=190) at Tehran University of Medical Science's School of Dentistry were the focus of a descriptive-analytical research conducted in 2018. The Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM), the demographic surveys, and the validated Persian version of the Sherer Self-Efficacy Scale were all employed by the researchers. The DREEM assessed students' perceptions of learning (PoL), teaching (PoT), academic self-perception (ASP), atmosphere (PoA), and social self-perception (SSP) in addition to other key categories. Demographic factors and educational data (academic level, admittance quota, overall average grade, final semester grade, employment experience outside of dentistry school, and self-perceived effectiveness) were included in the demographic questionnaire. The factors from the demographic questionnaire were compared to the educational climate and self-efficacy using linear regression analysis. Additionally, the association between the educational environment and self-efficacy was assessed using Pearson's correlation (rho) coefficient.Results: The majority of clinical dentistry students (87.3%) were single, female (52.6%), and lived in dorms. All DREEM domains and the overall educational environment, with the exception of the PoT domain (p-value=0.302), significantly correlated positively with students' self-efficacy (p-value < 0.05). Self-efficacy and the overall educational environment are highly associated (p=0.001, rho=0.311).Conclusion: A good educational atmosphere may enhance dental students’ self-efficacy.
Shima Hamzenejad; Roghaieh Ershad Sarabi; Yunes Jahani
Abstract
Background: E-learning is often covered in university curricula.Objectives: The purpose of this research was to identify the learning preferences of students and to look at the connection between learning styles and e-learning pleasure.Methods: All first- through third-year dentistry students at Kerman ...
Read More
Background: E-learning is often covered in university curricula.Objectives: The purpose of this research was to identify the learning preferences of students and to look at the connection between learning styles and e-learning pleasure.Methods: All first- through third-year dentistry students at Kerman University of Medical Sciences participated in this descriptive cross-sectional survey in 2022. Four key portions of a 50-question electronic survey were addressed: 1) Demographic questions, 2) Kolb learning style inventory, 3) the e-learning survey, and 4) satisfaction with the e-learning questionnaire. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to check the normality of the data. Descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, frequency, percentage) and analytical (Kruskal-Wallis test, chi-score test, Fisher's exact test) were used to analyze the data in SPSS software. A significance level of P>0.05 was considered.Results: The questionnaire was filled out by 120 students in total (88% response rate). Divergent learning styles substantially increased students' satisfaction with e-learning compared to other learning styles (P = 0.048). The demographic variable and learning style did not significantly correlate (age-gender-semester- mean score). Additionally, e-learning had a middle-of-the-road average satisfaction score (78.32).Conclusion: This research indicated a considerable relationship between dental students’ learning style and their satisfaction with e-learning.
Eileen Hoskin; Karl Woodmansey; Lynn Beck; Tobias Rodriguez
Abstract
Background and Objectives Healthcare providers must endeavor to treat patients with empathy if they expect to practice successfully. Empathy is especially relevant to dentists who provide treatment that is usually associated with pain and invasion of personal space boundaries. A 2011 study by Konrath ...
Read More
Background and Objectives Healthcare providers must endeavor to treat patients with empathy if they expect to practice successfully. Empathy is especially relevant to dentists who provide treatment that is usually associated with pain and invasion of personal space boundaries. A 2011 study by Konrath and O’Brien showed that undergraduate college students have less empathy than the past generations. Anecdotal reports and the author's personal experiences also suggest a reduction in empathy among current dental students. This study was designed to assess empathy in a dental student cohort at a dental school in the United States. Methods This study examined empathy levels in third- and fourth-year dental students at a dental school in the United States using existing validated medical education psychometric assessments modified for dental education. Specifically, the Jefferson scale of physician empathy-health professional (JSPE-HP) and patient-practitioner orientation scale (PPOS) questionnaires were modified for use in the dental education domain by substituting the word “dentist” for “physician” and replacing “medical procedures” with “dental procedures.” E-mails were sent to all 240 third- and fourth-year dental students at the Rutgers school of dental medicine (RSDM) inviting them to participate in a brief online survey about their perceptions of dentist-patient interactions. Results Of the 240 invited students, 84 participated in the survey (27%). All questions were answered with a high empathy rating except for two questions - “It is difficult for me to view things from my patient’s perspective” and “I can treat and relate best to patients who look like me and have similar beliefs.” The calculated Cronbach’s coefficient alpha was 0.71 indicating acceptable internal consistency reliability. Conclusions This study did not confirm the hypothesis that students lacked empathy. Only two statements were answered in ways that suggested a decrease in empathic cognition. The responses to the open-ended questions provided an insight into the students’ self-interested thought processes.
Jahangir Haghani; Molouk Torabi; Armin Rafiee-Pour
Volume 12, Issue 4 , January 2016, , Pages 671-678
Abstract
Background & Objective: Clinical training is of great importance in dentistry and has a direct impact on health of the society and treatment of patients The present study was conducted with the aim to obtain students point of views about facilities physical environment and training methods in the ...
Read More
Background & Objective: Clinical training is of great importance in dentistry and has a direct impact on health of the society and treatment of patients The present study was conducted with the aim to obtain students point of views about facilities physical environment and training methods in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology School of Dentistry of Kerman University of Medical Sciences Iran Methods: This descriptive and crosssectional study was conducted on dental students who had had passed at least 1 unit of radiology course The participants were selected through census sampling method The data collection tool was a questionnaire consisting of 28 items in 5 scales and a section on demographic information The 5 scales consisted of evaluation of equipment quality of education in terms of diagnosis skills quality of education in terms of clinical skills practical education on patients and miscellaneous questions The questionnaire was designed by the researchers and its validity and reliability were evaluated Data were analyzed in SPSS software using ttest and analysis of variance (ANOVA) All Pvalues of less than 005 were considered significant Results: Of the 146 respondents 432% were men and 568% were women The mean score of the questionnaire was 7624 ± 1442 from a total of 140 Overall students satisfaction was at a moderate level Students satisfaction level with practical training in different techniques and bone and dental fractures diagnosis using radiography was low In the students view the quantity and quality of radiography devices was inadequate There was no statistically significant association between different inputs in terms of satisfaction and the students gender Conclusion: The students in the present study were relatively satisfied with radiology courses However in their opinion the quantity and quality of radiology devices were low Thus the repairing and updating of the radiography devices is recommended