Strides in Development of Medical Education

Use of Two Step Small Group Discussion to Enhance Learning of Basic Immunology

Document Type : Brief report

Authors

Nafiseh Pakravan 1
Rouhangiz Norouzinia 2
Zohreh Ghazivakili 3
Behrooz Pouragha 4

1 Ph.D. in Immunology, Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, ALborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran

2 M.Sc. in Emergency Medicine, Instructor, Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Alborz, University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran

3 کارشناس ارشد مدیریت خدمات بهداشتی درمانی ، مرکز مطالعات توسعه آموزش پزشکی ،دانشگاه علوم پزشکی البرز، کرج ، ایران

4 Ph.D. in Health Services Administration, Assistant Professor, Department of Health Services Management, School of Public Health, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran

Abstract
  Background & Objective: Discussion in small groups is one of the most reliable methods that will lead to a deeper learning This method is based on the active participation of all members of the group The immunology course necessitates thought and connection among the presented content Therefore in this study the efficacy of this method in increasing students understanding of the relationship between the components of the immune system was evaluated   Methods: The course lectures were presented in 12 sessions each lasting 2 hours Then the students were given the opportunity to study for a few days An exam was taken based on the presented content and then the students were divided into groups under the titles of immune system cells The discussion sessions were conducted A second exam was taken after the discussion Scores of pre and postdiscussion in small groups were compared Students satisfaction with this approach was asked orally and through open questions and recorded   Results: A statistically significant increase was observed in students scores after the discussion in small groups compared to before the discussion Among the students 65% believed that this method had a great effect on deep understanding and were willing to repeat this approach Furthermore 82% of students believed that their confidence increased in respect to what they had learned   Conclusion: Small group discussion is a potent educational method because its implementation in 1 session on taught content resulted in an increase in scores The implementation of this method may be difficult for the teacher but this approach has significant effects on student learning behavior

Keywords

Small group discussion
Self
confidence
Communication skills
Learning behavior
  1. WFME office. World Federation for Medical Education. Basic medical education. WFME global standards for quality improvement. Denmark: University of Copenhagen; 2012: 21.
  2. Shaabani H. Training skills. Tehran: Samt; 2007. [In Persian]
  3. Mohammadi Keshavarz N, Hosseini SG. Health education and educational technology. Tehran: Art Institute of Dibagaran; 2004. [In Persian]
  4. Mahram M, Mahram B, Mousavi SN. Comparison between the effect of teaching through student-based group discussion and lecture on learning in medical students. J Strides Dev Med Educ. 2009, 5(2): 71-9. [In Persian]
  5. Shaabani H. Training skills. Tehran: Samt; 2007. [In Persian]
  6. Barrass R. Study! A guide to effective learning, revision and examination techniques. 2nd ed. London: Rutledge Pub; 2002: 59-63.
  7. Azizi F. Medical sciences education: challenges and perspectives. Tehran: Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Deputy for Education and Student affairs; 2003: 327. [In Persian]
  8. Kitchen M. Facilitating small groups: how to encourage student learning. Clin Teach. 2012; 9(1): 3-8 .
  9. Momeni Danaei S, Zarshenas L, Oshagh M, Omid Khoda S. Which method of teaching would be better; cooperative or lecture? Iran J Med Educ. 2011; 11(1): 24-3. [In Persian]
  10. Roche WP, Scheetz AP, Dane FC, Parish DC, O'Shea JT. Medical students' attitudes in a PBL curriculum: trust, altruism, and cynicism. Acad Med. 2003; 78(4):398-402.
  11. Curran VR, Sharpe D, Forristall J, Flynn K. Student satisfaction and perceptions of small group process in case-based interprofessional learning.. Med Teach. 2008; 30(4): 431-3.
  12. Malakouti M. Teaching in small groups (Group discussion). Bimonthly Educ Strateg Med Sci. 2010, 2(4): 183-7. [In Persian]
  13. Delaram M. The effect of lecture and focus group teaching methods on midwifery student’s learning in obstetrics (2) course. J Med Educ Develop. 2006; 2(2): 3-7. [In Persian]
  14. Fattahi Bafghi A, Karimi H, Anvari MH, Barzegar K. Comparison of the effectiveness of two teaching methods of group discussion and lecturing in learning rate of laboratory medicine students. J Strides Dev Med Educ. 2007, 4(1): 51-6. [In Persian]
  15. Soltani N, Naderi N, Zare S. Comparison between traditional teaching and small groups teaching methods in teaching physiology respiratory system in medical students: Hormozgan University of Medical Science. J Hormozgan Univ Med Sci. 2012, 16(4):317-24. [In Persian]
  16. Ghotbi N, Shirazi M, Jalaei Sh, Bagheri H, Naghdi S, Mousavi Sh. The targeted implementation of teaching in small group discussion for second- year students in physiotherapy: A comparative assessment of teaching effect on satisfaction and learning level. J Modern Rehabilitation. 2011; 5(3): 60-5. [In Persian]
  17. Safari M, Ghahari L. Comparing the effects of lecture and work in small groups on learning of head and neck osteology in medical students. Iran J Med Educ. 2011; 11(1):10-6. [In Persian]
  18. Moein A, Heydari Seraj M. Comparison of viewpoints of dermatology medical students involved in teaching-learning process about two methods of learning: group discussion versus lecture. Dermatology and Cosmetic. 2014; 5(2): 82-8. [In Persian]
  19. Jafari M. Comparison of lecture and blended teaching methods on learning and satisfaction of medical students in biochemistry course. Iran J  Med  Educ.  2012;  12(7):488-97.  [In Persian]
  20. Razavi  Sh,  Avizhgan  M.  Comparison  of lecture  and  group  discussion  methods  on learning  anatomical  sciences:  A  study  in  PhD students.  Iran  J  Med  Educ.  2012;  11(6):  580-1. [In Persian]
  21. Stevenson FT,  Bowe  CM,  Gandour-Edwards R,  Kumari  VG.  Paired  basic  science  and clinical problem-based learning faculty teaching  side  by  side:  do  students  evaluate them  differently?  Med  Educ.  2005;  39(2):194201.
  22. Pal  R,  Kar  S,  Zaman  FA,  Jha  DK,  Pal  S. Assessment  of  impact  of  small  group  teaching among  students  in  community  medicine. Indian J  Community  Med. 2012;  37(3):170-3  .
  23. Amin Khandaghi  M,  Saifi  G.  Effective capabilities  and  skills  needed  for  college teaching.  J  Res  Plan  Higher  Educ.  2013; 19(3):121-47. [In Persian]
  24. Fazeli N.  “Discussion”  a  method  for  teaching in  university.  J  Soc  Sci.  2003(24):61-100.  [In Persian]
  25. Eslamian H,  Saeedi  Rezvani  M,  Fatehi  Y. Comparison  of  the  effectiveness  of  teaching methods  of  group  discussion  and  lecture  on learning  and  satisfaction  of  students  in teaching  of  religion  and  life  courses  in  the secondary  school  students.  Res  Curriculum Plan. 2013;2(38):13-23. [In  Persian]  
Strides in Development of Medical Education
Volume 12, Issue 2
2015
Pages 399-406

Home

Editorial Policy

Submit Manuscript

Guide for Authors

Peer Review Process

Guide for Reviewers

Publication Ethics Policy

Forms

Suggestion and Complain

FAQ

Contact Us