Strides in Development of Medical Education

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Master of E-Learning in Medical Sciences, Medical Education Research Center, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of E-learning in Medical Education, Virtual School, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

3 Associate Professor, Department of E-learning in Medical Education, Virtual School, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

4 Master Student of Epidemiology, School of Health, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran

5 Assistant Professor, Department of Biotechnology, School of Advanced Technologies, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran

Abstract

Background: Nowadays, several studies have been performed on the factors affecting the effectiveness of virtual education. One of the characteristics of learners is their different learning styles.
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between learning style and the level of satisfaction and usage of e-learning facilities in medical students.
Methods: This cross-sectional and retrospective (ex post facto) study was performed among medical, public health, and operating room students of Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences in 2017. We redesigned their courses to be delivered in the blended method, so that teachers used a Learning Management System (LMS) in addition to traditional teaching. Information about learning styles was collected using Kolb’s questionnaire, satisfaction level evaluated with a researcher made questionnaire and use of e-learning was examined by checking system loggings. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, Tukey’s post hoc, Welch’s ANOVA and X2 tests in SPSS software.
Results: Students’ satisfaction with e-content in diverging learning style was higher (P = 0.032), but there was no significant relationship between learning style and demographic characteristics and total average mark. Also, there was no significant difference in the amount of using e-learning facilities between different learning style groups (P = 0.256).
Conclusion: It seems that using virtual learning facilities and considering the type of learning style in students can increase their satisfaction.

Keywords

  1. Konrady DM. (Dissertation). Choosing to Participate in E-Learning Education: A Study of Undergraduate Students' Diverse Perceptions, Attitudes, and Self-Identified Barriers To E-Learning. Philadelphia: Drexel University; 2015. doi:10.1891/9780826128034.0010
  2. Choules AP. The use of elearning in medical education: a review of the current situation. Postgrad Med J. 2007; 83(978): 212–6. doi:10.1136/pgmj.2006.054189
  3. Franz S, Behrends M, Haack C, Marschollek M. Benefits and Barriers of E-Learning for Staff Training in a Medical University. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;213:99-102.
  4. Mahoney NR, Boland MV, Ramulu PY, Srikumaran D. Implementing an electronic learning management system for an Ophthalmology residency program. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16(1):307. doi:10.1093/jahist/jav322
  5. Simonson M, Smaldino S, Zvacek SM. Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education. 6th ed. Charlotte, North Carolina: Information Age Pub; 2014.
  6. Abbaszadeh A, Sabeghi H, Borhani F, Heydari A. A comparative study on effect of e-learning and instructor-led methods on nurses’ documentation competency. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2011; 16(3): 235-43.
  7. Moazami F, Bahrampour E, Azar MR, Jahedi F, Moattari M. Comparing two methods of education (virtual versus traditional) on learning of Iranian dental students: a post-test only design study. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:45.
  8. Oliveira AC, Mattos S, Coimbra M. Development and assessment of an e-learning course on pediatric cardiology basics. JMIR Med Educ. 2017; 3(1): e10.
  9. Sharpe R, Benfield G, Roberts G, Francis R. The undergraduate experience of blended e-learning: a review of UK literature and practice. The Higher Education Academy. 2006:1-103. doi:10.1002/he.233
  10. Sinclair PM, Kable A, Levett-Jones T. The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015;13(1):52-64.
  11. Shahverdi M, Rostami Nia M, Shahverdi J, Mousavi SR. Evaluating the Satisfaction of Master Students from E-Learning Services at Payam Noor University in Tehran and providing a Quality Improvement. Tehran: Payam Noor University of Tehran; 2015. [In Persian]
  12. Truong HM. Integrating learning styles and adaptive e-learning system: Current developments, problems and opportunities. Computers in human behavior. 2016;55:1185-93. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.014
  13. Özerem A, Akkoyunlu B. Learning Environments Designed According to Learning Styles and Its Effects on Mathematics Achievement. Eurasian J Educational Research. 2015;61:61-80.
  14. Saedi Poor B, Masoumi Fard M. Investigating the Relationship between Control Source, Learning Styles and Self-Regulatory Learning with Academic Success of Students on Line Curriculum 92. Shahed University. 2013;20(92):19-38. doi:10.1111/oet.12044
  15. Buşan AM. Learning styles of medical students-implications in education. Curr Health Sci J. 2014;40(2):104-10. doi:10.1365/s35147-014-1166-3
  16. Otar khane A, Delavari V. Satisfaction of students from electronic education systems. Journal of Business Management. 2011;11(10):53-78.[In Persian]
  17. Ruggeri K, Farrington C, Brayne C. A global model for effective use and evaluation of e-learning in health. Telemed J E Health. 2013;19(4):312-21.
  18. Kolb AY, Kolb DA. The Kolb learning style inventory - Version 4.0. Boston: Hay Resources Direct Boston, MA; 2007.
  19. Izadi S, Mohammadzadeh Edmolaee R. Study of Relationship between Learning Styles, Personality Charac-teristics and Academic Performance. Traning & Learning Researches. 2008;1(27):15-29. [In Persian]
  20. Li YS, Yu WP, Liu CF, Shieh SH, Yang BH. An exploratory study of the relationship between learning styles and academic performance among students in different nursing programs. Contemp Nurse. 2014: 4470-99.
  21. Green LS, Inan FA, Denton B. Examination of Factors Impacting Student Satisfaction with a New Learning Management System. Turkish Online J Distance Education. 2012;13(3):189-97. doi:10.1002/ace.20003
  22. Sun PC, Tsai RJ, Finger G, Chen YY, Yeh D. What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & education. 2008; 50(4): 1183-202. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007
  23. Sayfouri N. Evaluation of the learning management system using students’ perceptions. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2016;30:460.
  24. Di Marco L, Venot A, Gillois P. Does the acceptance of hybrid learning affect learning approaches in France? J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2017; 14: 24.
  25. Back DA, Behringer F, Haberstroh N, Ehlers JP, Sostmann K, Peters H. Learning management system and e-learning tools: an experience of medical students' usage and expectations. Int J Med Educ. 2016; 7:267-73. doi:10.5116/ijme.57a5.f0f5
  26. Al-Neklawy AF. Online Embryology teaching using learning management systems appears to be a successful additional learning tool among Egyptian medical students. Ann Anat. 2017;214:9-14. doi:10.1016/j.aanat.2017.07.001
  27. Lawn S, Zhi X, Morello A. An integrative review of e-learning in the delivery of self-management support training for health professionals. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17(1):183.
  28. Romanelli F, Bird E, Ryan M. Learning styles: a review of theory, application, and best practices. Am J Pharm Educ. 2009;73(1):9.
  29. Ahadi F, Abedsaidi J, Arshadi F, Ghorbani R. Learning styles of nursing and allied health students in Semnan university of medical sciences. Koomesh. 2010;11(2):141-6. doi:10.5688/aj730109
  30. Pouratashi M, Movahed Mohammadi H, Shabanali Fami H, Rezvanfar A. Agricultural Students Learning Styles and its Impact on the Academic Performance. Iranian Agricultural Extension and Education Journal. 2009;5(1):37-46. doi:10.1016/S0015-1882(09)70092-8
  31. Borhani F, Vatanparast M, Abbaszadeh A, Seyfadini R. The effect of training in virtual environment on nursing students attitudes toward virtual learning and its relationship with learning style. Iran J Med Educ.2012;12(7):508-17.